Correlation between the Digital Cervicography and Pathological Diagnosis Performed at Private Clinics in Korea

Objective: To evaluate the correlation tendency between abnormal findings of digital cervicography and cervical pathology at private clinics in Korea. Methods: Abnormal finding of digital cervicography performed at private clinics in Korea between January 1, 2010 and May 31, 2012 were analysed retrospectively. The patient's age, abnormal findings of digital cervicography, cervical cytology, human papillomaviru (HPV) test and cervical pathology were investigated and the rate of agreement between abnormal finding of digital cervicography and cervical pathology results was calculated. Abnormal findings of digital cervicography were divided into 4 categories: atypical, compatible with CIN1, compatible with CIN2/3 and compatible with cancer. Results: The study group was composed of 1547 women with a mean (range) age of 37.4 (14-91 years). The agreement rate between abnormal findings of digital cervicography and cervical pathology was 52.0% in “compatible with CIN1”, 78.9% in “compatible with CIN2/3”, and 90.2% in “compatible with cancer”. Conclusions: Abnormal findings of digital cervicography were highly concordant with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer examined at outpatient clinics in Korea. Therefore, abnormal interpretations of digital cervicography can be used as an excellent auxiliary technique with cervical cytology for CIN and cancer.

[1]  L. Mango,et al.  Cervicography screening for cervical cancer among 8460 women in a high-risk population. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  P. Blumenthal,et al.  New technologies in cervical cancer precursor detection , 2000, Current opinion in oncology.

[3]  X H Zhou,et al.  Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  P. Disaia,et al.  Colposcopy to evaluate abnormal cervical cytology in 2008. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  D G Ferris,et al.  Cervicography--an adjunct to Papanicolaou screening. , 1994, American family physician.

[6]  H. Adami,et al.  International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening , 1997, Cancer Causes & Control.

[7]  M. Temmerman,et al.  Comparison of pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus DNA‐PCR testing and cervicography , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Cervical cancer screening with cervicography and cytology. , 1995, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[10]  Daron G Ferris,et al.  Interobserver Agreement for Colposcopy Quality Control Using Digitized Colposcopic Images During the ALTS Trial , 2005, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[11]  Allan B MacLean Acetowhite epithelium. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  A. Štafl,et al.  Cervicography: a new method for cervical cancer detection. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  P. Robinson The interpretation of diagnostic tests. , 1987, Nuclear medicine communications.

[15]  A. Forsythe,et al.  A Comparison of the Papanicolaou Smear and the Cervigram: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Cost Analysis , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Ferris Dg,et al.  Cervicography--an adjunct to Papanicolaou screening. , 1994 .

[17]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Invasive cervical carcinoma in young women. , 1979, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  J. Doorbar,et al.  Human Papillomaviruses , 2006, Methods in Molecular Medicine.

[19]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  L. Coppleson,et al.  Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cercival cytology. , 1974, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  J. Taylor,et al.  False-Negative Cytology Rates in Patients in Whom Invasive Cervical Cancer Subsequently Developed , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  J. Blythe Cervicography: a preliminary report. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature. , 1998, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[24]  J. Bennington,et al.  Cervical cancer after initial negative and atypical vaginal cytology. , 1970, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Y. Qiao,et al.  Inappropriate gold standard bias in cervical cancer screening studies , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[26]  Yvonne C Collins,et al.  Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.