Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.

In binocular viewing of natural three-dimensional scenes, occlusion relationships between objects at different depths create regions of the background that are visible to only one eye. These monocular regions can support depth perception. There are two viewing conditions in which a monocular region can be on the nasal side of a binocular surface--(a) when a background surface is viewed through an aperture and (b) when a region is camouflaged against the background in one eye's view. We created stimuli with a monocular region using complex textures in which camouflage was not possible, and for which there was no physical aperture. For these stimuli, observers perceived a strong phantom contour in near depth at the edge of the monocular region, with the monocular texture perceived behind at the depth of the binocular surface. Depth-matching with a probe showed that the depth of the phantom occluding surface was as precise as for stimuli with regular binocular disparity. Monocular regions of texture on the opposite (temporal) side of the binocular surface were perceived behind, as predicted by occlusion geometry, and there was no phantom surface. We discuss the implications for models of da Vinci stereopsis and stereoscopic edge processing, and consider the involvement of a form of Panum's limiting case. We conclude that the visual system uses a combination of occlusion geometry and complex matching to precisely locate edges in depth that lack a luminance contour.

[1]  Osamu Watanabe,et al.  Stereo algorithm that extracts a depth cue from interocularly unpaired points , 1999, Neural Networks.

[2]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  R. Lawson,et al.  Stereopsis and anomalous contour. , 1967, Vision research.

[4]  S G Blackburn,et al.  Surface Separation Decreases Stereoscopic Slant but a Monocular Aperture Increases it , 1998, Perception.

[5]  W H Ehrenstein,et al.  Early Demonstrations of Subjective Contours, Amodal Completion, and Depth from Half-Occlusions: “Stereoscopic Experiments with Silhouettes” by Adolf von Szily (1921) , 1998, Perception.

[6]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[7]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms , 2002, Vision Research.

[8]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular Matching of Dissimilar Features in Phantom Stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  Michael Cook,et al.  Monocular Discs in the Occlusion Zones of Binocular Surfaces Do Not Have Quantitative Depth—A Comparison with Panum's Limiting Case , 2003, Perception.

[11]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  The Influence of monocular regions on the binocular perception of spatial layout , 2011 .

[12]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.

[14]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Nyman,et al.  Depth Asymmetry in da Vinci Stereopsis , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  David Alais,et al.  Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[17]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[18]  Barbara J Gillam,et al.  Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap , 2003, Vision Research.

[19]  Philip M. Grove,et al.  Slant or occlusion: global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Michael Cook,et al.  Depth of monocular elements in a binocular scene: the conditions for da Vinci stereopsis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Ann B. Lee.  Occlusion Models for Natural Images : A Statistical Study of a Scale-Invariant Dead Leaves Model , 2001 .

[24]  Martin Kaye,et al.  Stereopsis without binocular correlation , 1978, Vision Research.

[25]  Inna Tsirlin,et al.  Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[26]  Lei Liu,et al.  Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence , 1994, Nature.

[27]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation , 1987, Vision Research.

[28]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Interpolation and the detection of fine structure in stereoscopic matching , 1987, Vision Research.

[29]  Barbara J Gillam,et al.  The swinging doors of perception: stereomotion without binocular matching. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[30]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis , 1994, Nature.

[31]  S. McKee,et al.  The role of retinal correspondence in stereoscopic matching , 1988, Vision Research.

[32]  B Gillam,et al.  The Role of Monocular Regions in Stereoscopic Displays , 1988, Perception.

[33]  Ning Qian,et al.  Solving da Vinci stereopsis with depth-edge-selective V2 cells , 2007, Vision Research.

[34]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  What is the depth of a sinusoidal grating? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[35]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception , 2009, Vision Research.

[36]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[37]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  The role of transparency in da Vinci stereopsis , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[39]  S. Grossberg,et al.  A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and three-dimensional surface perception , 2003, Vision Research.

[40]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  The Stereoscopic Sliver: A Comparison of Duration Thresholds for Fully Stereoscopic and Unmatched Versions , 2007, Perception.

[41]  S. Nakamizo,et al.  Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information , 2006, Vision Research.

[42]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone , 1999, Vision Research.