Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment

Non-human animals and human children can make use of the geometric shape of an environment for spatial reorientation and in some circumstances reliance on purely geometric information (metric properties of surfaces and sense) can overcome the use of local featural cues. Little is known as to whether the use of geometric information is in some way reliant on past experience or, as would likely be argued by advocates of the notion of a geometric module, it is innate. We tested the navigational abilities of newborn domestic chicks reared in either rectangular or circular cages. Chicks were trained in a rectangular-shaped enclosure with panels placed at the corners to provide salient featural cues. Rectangular-reared and circular-reared chicks proved equally able to learn the task. When tested after removal of the featural cues, both rectangular- and circular-reared chicks showed evidence that they had spontaneously encoded geometric information. Moreover, when trained in a rectangular-shaped enclosure without any featural cues, chicks reared in rectangular-, circular-, or c-shaped cages proved to be equally able to learn and perform the task using geometric information. These results suggest that effective use of geometric information for spatial reorientation does not require experience in environments with right angles and metrically distinct surfaces, thus supporting the hypothesis of a predisposed geometric module in the animal brain.

[1]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[3]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[7]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[8]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[10]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visual Cognition and Representation in Birds and Primates , 2004 .

[11]  Verner P Bingman,et al.  Spared feature-structure discrimination but diminished salience of environmental geometry in hippocampal-lesioned homing pigeons (Columba livia). , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[13]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Hippocampal formation is required for geometric navigation in pigeons , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish. , 2007, Psychological science.

[15]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[16]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[17]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  Preexisting Knowledge Versus On-Line Learning , 2005, Psychological science.

[18]  A. Karmiloff-Smith Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Animals as Natural Geometers , 2009 .

[20]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[21]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence , 2009 .

[22]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Conjoining information from different modules: A comparative perspective , 2002 .

[24]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[25]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[26]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[27]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. , 1982 .

[28]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. , 2006, Science.

[29]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Growing in Circles , 2007 .

[30]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[31]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language , 2003 .

[32]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[33]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[34]  H. Evans The Study of Instinct , 1952 .

[35]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: evidence for geometric and non-geometric features , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[36]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[37]  Lesley J. Rogers,et al.  Comparative vertebrate cognition : are primates superior to non-primates? , 2004 .

[38]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[40]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[41]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Reflections on geometry and navigation , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[42]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[43]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.