Evaluating Effectiveness of Interaction Techniques across Immersive Virtual Environmental Systems

This paper presents the results of a formal experiment to compare different interaction techniques across two types of immersive display: an immersive projection technology (IPT) and a head-mounted display (HMD). Our aim is to investigate the effectiveness of two widely used interaction metaphors, virtual hand and ray casting, on these two display technologies. Our motivation is that design and evaluation of interaction techniques for immersive egocentric display systems has been undertaken almost exclusively on HMDs. We argue that basing interaction for IPTs on techniques developed for other types of immersive systems is a flawed approach, as there are some categorical differences between the experience given by an IPT and an HMD. For example, an IPT user has a much wider field of view than an HMD user. We have chosen two types of interaction tasks to study: simple selection of objects both near to and at some distance from the user, and manipulation of objects involving a change of both position and orientation. As previous studies have found, we find that ray casting is preferable for selection and virtual hand is preferable for manipulation for a HMD. We show that this is also the case for the IPT. More interestingly, while we find performance on selection tasks is much better on the IPT, for manipulation tasks there is little difference between the two display technologies.

[1]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  G. Michel,et al.  Restricting the Field of View: Perceptual and Performance Effects , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments , 1997, SI3D.

[5]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR , 1996, UIST '96.

[6]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Formalizing the Design, Evaluation, and Application of Interaction Techniques for Immersive Virtual Environments , 1999, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[7]  James P. Bliss,et al.  The Virtual Environment Performance Assessment Battery (VEPAB):Development and Evaluation1 , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  Carolina Cruz-Neira,et al.  VR Juggler: a virtual platform for virtual reality application development , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[10]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Redirected Walking in Place , 2002, EGVE.

[11]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: as good as being there together? , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[12]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  A framework and testbed for studying manipulation techniques for immersive VR , 1997, VRST '97.

[13]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Egocentric Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments: Empirical Evaluation of Interaction Techniques , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  Robert Stone.  Applications of Virtual Environments: An Overview , 2002 .

[15]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Human Factors Issues in Virtual Environments: A Review of the Literature , 1998, Presence.

[16]  Deborah Hix,et al.  Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of Methods , 2001 .

[17]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques , 2001, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..

[18]  Anthony Steed,et al.  3D Selection Strategies for Head Tracked and Non-Head Tracked Operation of Spatially Immersive Displays , 2004 .

[19]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[20]  Frederick P. Brooks.  What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[22]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Successes and Failures in Co-Present Situations , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.