About Fluence and Process Parameters on Maraging Steel Processed by Selective Laser Melting: Do They Convey the Same Information?

In this paper the influence of process parameters and fluence on mechanical properties of maraging steel in Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is studied. The results of the present work show that there exists a steady region of process parameters where fluence conveys all the information required to describe and predict density and tensile properties. We also show that in this region of the parameters, the choice of process parameters can be carried out considering other optimality criteria such as productivity, rather than maximization of density. To pursue this objective, a V-Alphabetical optimal design with fixed fluence levels was specifically designed for the experimentation. The used fluence levels and the corresponding process parameter combinations were tested on an industrial SLM system. To compare the informative content of fluence and the process parameters, two regression equation were estimated from experimental results for part density and tensile properties. The comparison of the regression models showed that the predictive ability of fluence and process parameters in the steady region is the same, however fluence allowed to obtain a higher precision. In conclusion, based on the experimental conditions studied, new process parameters are suggested using a productivity-based criteria.

[1]  Abdolreza Simchi,et al.  The role of particle size on the laser sintering of iron powder , 2004 .

[2]  Kuo Chun-Liang,et al.  Parametric optimization of density and dimensions in three-dimensional printing of Ti-6Al-4V powders on titanium plates using selective laser melting , 2017 .

[3]  K. Ridgway,et al.  Critical evaluation of the pulsed selective laser melting process when fabricating Ti64 parts using a range of particle size distributions , 2018 .

[4]  G. Levy,et al.  Comparison of density of stainless steel 316 L parts produced with selective laser melting using different powder grades , 2009 .

[5]  Yang Liu,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel metal parts obtained through selective laser melting , 2016 .

[6]  Timothy P. Quinn,et al.  Effects of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated using electron beam melting (EBM), Part 2: Energy input, orientation, and location , 2013 .

[7]  Ali Gökhan Demir,et al.  Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting , 2017 .

[8]  K. Senthilkumaran,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigations on laser melting of stainless steel 316L metal powders , 2014 .

[9]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Tensile, fracture, and fatigue crack growth properties of a 3D printed maraging steel through selective laser melting , 2017 .

[10]  Brent Stucker,et al.  The Effects of Processing Parameters on Defect Regularity in Ti-6Al-4V Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting , 2013 .

[11]  Brent Stucker,et al.  Influences of Energy Density on Porosity and Microstructure of Selective Laser Melted 17-4PH Stainless Steel , 2013 .

[12]  A. Demir,et al.  From pulsed to continuous wave emission in SLM with contemporary fiber laser sources: effect of temporal and spatial pulse overlap in part quality , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[13]  Nick Jones,et al.  Metal Based Additive Layer Manufacturing: Variations, Correlations and Process Control , 2016, KES.

[14]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[15]  Johann Sienz,et al.  Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[16]  J. Schoenung,et al.  On the limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a design parameter for Selective Laser Melting , 2017 .

[17]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  The effect of laser power and traverse speed on microstructure, porosity, and build height in laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V , 2000 .

[18]  Zhiheng Hu,et al.  Experimental investigation on selective laser melting of 17-4PH stainless steel , 2017 .

[19]  A. Spierings,et al.  Comparison of density measurement techniques for additive manufactured metallic parts , 2011 .

[20]  J. Eckert,et al.  Is the energy density a reliable parameter for materials synthesis by selective laser melting? , 2017 .

[21]  C. Emmelmann,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Metals , 2016 .

[22]  I. Ashcroft,et al.  Dynamic compressive response of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy hierarchical honeycomb structures , 2018, Composite Structures.

[23]  R. Morgan,et al.  Density analysis of direct metal laser re-melted 316L stainless steel cubic primitives , 2004 .

[24]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of maraging steel 300 after Selective Laser Melting , 2010 .

[25]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[26]  R. Hague,et al.  A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting , 2016 .

[27]  A. Tünnermann,et al.  Selective laser melting of copper using ultrashort laser pulses , 2017 .

[28]  Horst Meier,et al.  Experimental studies on selective laser melting of metallic parts , 2008 .

[29]  I. Ashcroft,et al.  Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting , 2014 .