Implementing Ethics in Healthcare AI-Based Applications: A Scoping Review

A number of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics frameworks have been published in the last 6 years in response to the growing concerns posed by the adoption of AI in different sectors, including healthcare. While there is a strong culture of medical ethics in healthcare applications, AI-based Healthcare Applications (AIHA) are challenging the existing ethics and regulatory frameworks. This scoping review explores how ethics frameworks have been implemented in AIHA, how these implementations have been evaluated and whether they have been successful. AI specific ethics frameworks in healthcare appear to have a limited adoption and they are mostly used in conjunction with other ethics frameworks. The operationalisation of ethics frameworks is a complex endeavour with challenges at different levels: ethics principles, design, technology, organisational, and regulatory. Strategies identified in this review are proactive, contextual, technological, checklist, organisational and/or evidence-based approaches. While interdisciplinary approaches show promises, how an ethics framework is implemented in an AI-based Healthcare Application is not widely reported, and there is a need for transparency for trustworthy AI.

[1]  Michael D Abramoff,et al.  Lessons learnt about Autonomous AI: Finding a safe, efficacious and ethical path through the development process. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Marcello Ienca,et al.  Proactive Ethical Design for Neuroengineering, Assistive and Rehabilitation Technologies: the Cybathlon Lesson , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  I. Singh,et al.  Can Your Phone Be Your Therapist? Young People’s Ethical Perspectives on the Use of Fully Automated Conversational Agents (Chatbots) in Mental Health Support , 2019, Biomedical informatics insights.

[4]  Carl-Maria Mörch,et al.  Canada Protocol: an ethical checklist for the use of Artificial Intelligence in Suicide Prevention and Mental Health , 2019, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[5]  L. Floridi,et al.  A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society , 2019, Issue 1.

[6]  Neil McBride,et al.  Robot Enhanced Therapy for Autistic Children: An Ethical Analysis , 2020, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[7]  M. Howell,et al.  Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Oliver K. Burmeister,et al.  Overcoming carer shortages with care robots: Dynamic value trade-offs in run-time , 2019, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  P. V. van Heerden,et al.  Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care , 2019, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental.

[11]  David Tien,et al.  A New Design Approach and Framework for Elderly Care Robots , 2018, ACIS.

[12]  B. Klein,et al.  A robotic shower system , 2017, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[13]  Shin'ichi Fukuzumi,et al.  Extraction of New Guideline Items from the View Point of ELSI (Ethics, Legal, Social Issues) for Service Utilized AI-Focus on Healthcare Area , 2019, HCI.

[14]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices , 2019, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[15]  Vincent Berenz,et al.  A Value-Driven Eldercare Robot: Virtual and Physical Instantiations of a Case-Supported Principle-Based Behavior Paradigm , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Khin Than Win,et al.  The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care , 2019, Breast.

[17]  Maria Luiza Recena Menezes,et al.  Design for an Art Therapy Robot: An Explorative Review of the Theoretical Foundations for Engaging in Emotional and Creative Painting with a Robot , 2018, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction.

[18]  T. Körtner,et al.  Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people , 2016, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[19]  R. Calvo,et al.  Responsible AI—Two Frameworks for Ethical Design Practice , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society.

[20]  Eric J Topol,et al.  High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[21]  Michael Gao,et al.  "The human body is a black box": supporting clinical decision-making with deep learning , 2019, FAT*.

[22]  Hossam M. Hammady,et al.  Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[23]  M. Abràmoff,et al.  Autonomous Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy: From Algorithm to Clinical Application , 2020, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[24]  Anna Goldenberg,et al.  Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning , 2020, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Dylan Cawthorne,et al.  An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare , 2020, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[26]  Luís Santos,et al.  Verification Methodology of Ethical Compliance for Users, Researchers and Developers of Personal Care Robots , 2017, WorldCIST.

[27]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Valerie Carr,et al.  Virtual carers for the elderly: A case study review of ethical responsibilities , 2016, Digital health.

[29]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[30]  Hal Hodson,et al.  Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms , 2017, Health and Technology.

[31]  Bernice Elger,et al.  Ethical Design of Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia: A Descriptive Review , 2017, Science and Engineering Ethics.