Economic and environmental evaluation of selected advanced power generation technologies

In this article, the economic and ecological benefits of selected advanced technologies for electricity production based on coal and natural gas are evaluated. Among the analysed technologies are integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems, supercritical coal-fired power plants, multi-fuel hybrid cycles, and natural gas combined cycles. In addition, as a complement to coal technologies, CO2 capture and storage installations are adopted. The main indicators evaluated are the unit carbon dioxide emission and the break-even price of electricity. The analysis took into account, among other factors, the existing support mechanisms for ecological technologies, primarily in the form of the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme. The analysis shows that the systems integrated with CO2 capture can be competitive compared to systems without capture. Especially interesting in this context are IGCC systems integrated with carbon capture installations. The results are, however, affected by many factors, such as the fuel price, operational reliability, and auxiliary power need. The influence of these factors is evaluated in this article both qualitatively and quantitatively.

[1]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[2]  Janusz Kotowicz,et al.  The influence of membrane CO2 separation on the efficiency of a coal-fired power plant , 2010 .

[3]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost , 2009 .

[4]  Janusz Kotowicz,et al.  THE THERMODYNAMIC AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE SUPERCRITICAL COAL FIRED POWER PLANT WITH CCS INSTALLATION , 2009 .

[5]  R. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: Economic analysis , 2005 .

[6]  Robert H. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions , 2005 .

[7]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Comparison of coal IGCC with and without CO2 capture and storage: Shell gasification with standard vs. partial water quench , 2009 .

[8]  B. C. Williams,et al.  Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plant , 2000 .

[9]  Georges Heyen,et al.  Mathematical modelling and design of an advanced once-through heat recovery steam generator , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Wojciech M. Budzianowski,et al.  Engineering benefits of mass recirculation in novel energy technologies with CO2 capture , 2010 .

[11]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture , 2010 .

[12]  Julianne M. Klara,et al.  The potential of advanced technologies to reduce carbon capture costs in future IGCC power plants , 2009 .

[13]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Retrofitting CO2 capture ready fossil plants with post-combustion capture. Part 2: Requirements for natural gas combined cycle plants using solvent-based flue gas scrubbing , 2009 .

[14]  J. Warner,et al.  Combined - Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants , 1999 .

[15]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Models of CO 2 Transport and Storage Costs and Their Importance in CCS Cost Estimates , 2005 .

[16]  Jay A. Ratafia-brown,et al.  Major Environmental Aspects of Gasification-Based Power Generation Technologies , 2002 .

[17]  H. Herzog.  THE COST OF CARBON CAPTURE , 2000 .

[18]  Jochen Ströhle,et al.  Dynamic simulation of a supercritical once-through heat recovery steam generator during load changes and start-up procedures , 2009 .

[19]  Andreas Poullikkas,et al.  Assessment of integrated gasification combined cycle technology competitiveness , 2008 .

[20]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Retrofitting CO2 capture ready fossil plants with post-combustion capture. Part 1: Requirements for supercritical pulverized coal plants using solvent-based flue gas scrubbing , 2009 .

[21]  Mario Amelio,et al.  Integrated gasification gas combined cycle plant with membrane reactors: Technological and economical analysis , 2007 .

[22]  D. J. Smit.  Upgrading older power plants can be more cost effective than new construction , 1997 .