Abstract Forestry projects can - at least temporarily - mitigate the net flux of anthropogenic CO 2 to the atmosphere by removing C from the atmosphere and sequestering it in growing trees. The net flux of C to the atmosphere can also be reduced if trees are burned to displace the burning of fossil fuels and are then replanted to recycle the C back into the biosphere, or if wood is used for products that store carbon and are otherwise made from other, more energy-intensive materials. A computer model is employed to calculate carbon balances of two land management and biomass utilization scenarios - conventional forest management and short-rotation forestry. Sensitivity analyses reveal that the most important site and system dependent parameters for the net reduction of carbon emissions are the site occupancy prior to the project, growth rate, efficiency of biomass conversion into energy and non-energy products, and carbon emission rates and efficiencies of displaced fossil fuel cycles. The results demonstrate that time is another important consideration and that projects can look considerably different, in terms of C balance, when the endpoint of the analysis is 20, 50, or 100 years.
[1]
Gregg Marland,et al.
Carbon implications of forest management strategies
,
1996
.
[2]
I. H. Öğüş,et al.
NATO ASI Series
,
1997
.
[3]
G. Marland,et al.
SHOULD WE STORE CARBON IN TREES
,
1992
.
[4]
M. Harmon,et al.
Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests
,
1990,
Science.
[5]
R. Dewar,et al.
Analytical model of carbon storage in the trees, soils, and wood products of managed forests.
,
1991,
Tree physiology.
[6]
R. H. Williams,et al.
Alternative roles for biomass in coping with greenhouse warming
,
1991
.
[7]
R. K. Dixon,et al.
Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems
,
1994,
Science.
[8]
J. Ranney,et al.
Carbon storage and recycling in short-rotation energy crops
,
1991
.
[9]
Present role of German forests and forestry in the national carbon budget and options to its increase
,
1993
.