Energy efficiency, vehicle weight, driving range, and fuel economy are compared among fuel cell vehicles (FCV) with different types of fuel storage and battery-powered electric vehicles. Three options for onboard fuel storage are examined and compared in order to evaluate the most energy efficient option of storing fuel in fuel cell vehicles: compressed hydrogen gas storage, metal hydride storage, and onboard reformer of methanol. Solar energy is considered the primary source for fair comparison of efficiencies for true zero emission vehicles. Component efficiencies are from the literature. The battery powered electric vehicle has the highest efficiency of conversion from solar energy for a driving range of 300 miles. Among the fuel cell vehicles, the most efficient is the vehicle with onboard compressed hydrogen storage. The compressed gas FCV is also the leader in four other categories: vehicle weight for a given range, driving range for a given weight, efficiency starting with fossil fuels, and miles per gallon equivalent (about equal to a hybrid electric) on urban and highway driving cycles.
[1]
Joan M. Ogden,et al.
A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development
,
1999
.
[2]
Mark A. DeLuchi,et al.
Solar-Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Vehicles
,
1993
.
[3]
S. Furuhama,et al.
A study on the effect of the total weight of fuel and fuel tank on the driving performances of cars
,
1998
.
[4]
M. J. Riezenman,et al.
The search for better batteries
,
1995
.
[5]
Max Åhman,et al.
Primary energy efficiency of alternative powertrains in vehicles
,
2001
.