A Knowledge-based View of Agenda-formation in the Development of Human Resource Information Systems

Human resource information systems (HRIS) can potentially transform human resourcing tasks, but conflicts between HR and IS managers can hinder HRIS design and implementation projects. The ethnographic narrative in this article presents an HR and an IS project manager initially conflicting during the ‘agenda formation’ stage of an HRIS project in a transnational organization because they took different perspectives (as evidenced by their use of different heuristic and generative metaphors), thus constraining progress. However, from politically oriented public and private rhetorical activities, new knowledge emerged following an ‘epiphany of knowing’ experienced by the HR manager and progress was made. It is suggested that in managers' rhetorical activities both generative and heuristic metaphors can aid ‘relational knowing’, which is an important precursor to situated learning. However, care must be taken to recognize the political aspects of such processes and the potential hegemony of different knowledge disciplines in IS project development work.

[1]  E. C. Hughes,et al.  Institutional Office and the Person , 1937, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  E. Schwartz,et al.  The quest for certainty. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[3]  K. Menninger,et al.  Mirrors and Masks: The Search for Identity. , 1960 .

[4]  W. Bean.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[5]  Peter Christen Asbjørnsen.  Tales from the Field , 1970 .

[6]  D. Davidson.  What Metaphors Mean , 1978, Critical Inquiry.

[7]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[8]  R. Harré,et al.  Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology , 1980 .

[9]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[10]  Donald B. Fedor,et al.  Myth Making: A Qualitative Step in OD Interventions , 1982 .

[11]  J. Bartunek.  Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[13]  Laura Hall,et al.  How Personnel Managers Come to Terms with the Computer , 1989 .

[14]  Frank J. Barrett,et al.  Generative Metaphor Intervention: A New Approach for Working with Systems Divided by Conflict and Caught in Defensive Perception , 1990 .

[15]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[18]  Ian E. Morley,et al.  A social psychology of organizing: People, processes and contexts , 1991 .

[19]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[20]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World , 1992 .

[21]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[22]  Donald A. Schön.  Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[23]  J. Shotter.  Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language , 1993 .

[24]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Ceo Publication G 93-16 (236) Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition , 1994 .

[25]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[26]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[27]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[28]  Robert Prus,et al.  Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience , 1995 .

[29]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[30]  T. Watson,et al.  In Search of Management: Culture, Chaos and Control in Managerial Work , 1996 .

[31]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[32]  Mickey Zemon.  Human resource management and technical change , 1996 .

[33]  Gregory S. Jelf,et al.  Human resource information systems: operational issues and strategic considerations in a global environment , 1996 .

[34]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation , 1996 .

[35]  Mission statements in service and industrial corporations , 1996 .

[36]  T. Watson,et al.  Theorizing Managerial Work: a Pragmatic Pluralist Approach to Interdisciplinary Research , 1997 .

[37]  Tony Morden,et al.  Leadership as vision , 1997 .

[38]  Andrew D. Brown.  Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implimentation , 1998 .

[39]  Barbara Czarniawska.  A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies , 1998 .

[40]  C. Tansley,et al.  Visions and vision making in practical managerial and leadership discourse , 1998 .

[41]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[42]  K. Gergen.  An invitation to social construction , 1999 .

[43]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  M. Robertson,et al.  Knowledge management practices within a knowledge‐intensive firm: the significance of the people management dimension , 2000 .

[46]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[47]  D. Teece.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions , 2000 .

[48]  Silvia Gberardi.  Where Learning is: Metaphors and Situated Learning in a Planning Group , 2000 .

[49]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[50]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity , 2001 .

[51]  D. Coghlan.  Power, Politics and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game , 2001 .

[52]  Sue Newell,et al.  Effecting HRM‐style practices through an integrated human resource information system: An e‐greenfield site? , 2001 .

[53]  Eran Vigoda,et al.  Reactions to Organizational Politics: A Cross-Cultural Examination in Israel and Britain , 2001 .

[54]  Kirstie Ball,et al.  The use of human resource information systems: a survey , 2001 .

[55]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge creation in an ERP project team: the unexpected debilitating impact of social capital , 2001 .

[56]  Constructing changes in relational processes. Introducing a social constructionist approach to change work , 2001 .

[57]  S. Gherardi.  From Organizational Learning to Practice-Based Knowing , 2001 .

[58]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[59]  M. Fischetti.  Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.