Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species

Purse seine fishing on fish aggregating devices (FADs) has expanded considerably during the last 15 yr in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries, and FADs currently account for about 70% of their reported tuna catches. The scientific community has expressed concern over the consequences of this fishing practice in terms of yield per recruit and suspected detrimental effects on FADassociated tunas. To explore possible detrimental effects, we compared stomach fullness, fish plumpness, growth rate, and migration behaviour between free school and drifting FAD-associated tunas for skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis and yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares caught in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Significant differences in fish plumpness and individual growth rates were found, suggesting that individuals associated with drifting FADs were less healthy than those in free schools. Since stomach fullness indicated that tunas associated with FADs eat less than those in free schools, the difference in growth rate and condition could be the consequence of altered feeding patterns. For each species, significant changes in migratory direction and displacement rates were observed in the presence of drifting FADs. These findings support the hypothesis that FADs act as a super-stimulus, misleading tunas to make inappropriate habitat selection. However, further studies are required to investigate the long-term effect of FADs on the entire life cycle of tunas.

[1]  A. Klimley,et al.  School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares , 1999 .

[2]  A. Fonteneau,et al.  An efficient way of bait-fishing for tunas recently developed in Senegal , 1994 .

[3]  Frank R. Thompson,et al.  Edge effects and ecological traps : Effects on shrubland birds in Missouri , 2001 .

[4]  G. Horváth,et al.  Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  Frédéric Ménard,et al.  Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? , 2000 .

[6]  P. Cayre.  Behaviour of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelarnis) around fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Comoros Islands as determined by ultrasonic tagging , 1991 .

[7]  L. W. Gysel,et al.  Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field‐Forest Ecotones , 1978 .

[8]  J. Hallier,et al.  Review of tuna fisheries on floating objects in the Indian Ocean , 1992 .

[9]  F. Thompson,et al.  MODELING THE ECOLOGICAL TRAP HYPOTHESIS: A HABITAT AND DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR MIGRANT SONGBIRDS , 2001 .

[10]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Dynamics of pelagic fish distribution and behaviour : effects on fisheries and stock assessment , 1999 .

[11]  I. Ohta,et al.  Aggregating Behavior of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tuna Tagged With Coded Ultrasonic Transmitters Around FADs in Okinawa, Japan , 2001 .

[12]  T. M. Bergin,et al.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for analysis of nest orientation in western kingbirds (Tyrannus verticalis) , 1991 .

[13]  Alain Fonteneau,et al.  A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs , 2000 .

[14]  J. Battin.  When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal Populations , 2004 .

[15]  T. Baker,et al.  Control of Pink Bollworm Moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) with Insecticides and Pheromones (Attracticide): Lethal and Sublethal Effects , 1986 .

[16]  J. Kolbe,et al.  IMPACT OF NEST‐SITE SELECTION ON NEST SUCCESS AND NEST TEMPERATURE IN NATURAL AND DISTURBED HABITATS , 2002 .

[17]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Ingestion of marine debris by juvenile sea turtles in coastal Florida habitats , 1994 .

[18]  K. Holland,et al.  Movement and vulnerability of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in relation to FADs and natural aggregation points , 2000 .

[19]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  D. Boag,et al.  Ducks nesting in association with gulls—an ecological trap? , 1972 .

[21]  P. Sherman,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary traps. , 2002 .

[22]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Individual differences in horizontal movements of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in nearshore areas in French Polynesia, determined using ultrasonic telemetry , 2000 .

[23]  K. Holland,et al.  Different residence times of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, and bigeye tuna, T. obesus, found in mixed aggregations over a seamount , 1999 .

[24]  T. Fritts.  Plastic bags in the intestinal tracts of leatherback marine turtles , 1982 .

[25]  N. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[26]  Javier Ariz,et al.  Observed changes in the species composition of tuna schools in the Gulf of Guinea between 1981 and 1999, in relation with the Fish Aggregating Device fishery , 2000 .

[27]  Arturo Fabian Eduardo Muhlia Melo,et al.  The occurrence of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) at Espiritu Santo Seamount in the Gulf of California , 2003 .

[28]  D. Gaertner,et al.  Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem , 2000 .