In the presence of large uncertainty, a controller needs to be able to adapt rapidly to regain performance. Fast adaptation is referred to the implementation of adaptive control with a large adaptive gain to reduce the tracking error rapidly. However, a large adaptive gain can lead to high-frequency oscillations which can adversely affect robustness of an adaptive control law. As the adaptive gain increases, the time delay margin for a standard model-reference adaptive control decreases, hence loss of robustness. Optimal control modification is a new adaptive control method developed recently to achieve fast adaptation with robustness. Its formulation is based on the minimization of the L2 norm of the tracking error, posed as an optimal control problem. Computer simulations as well as pilot-in-the-loop high-fidelity simulations in a motion-based flight simulator demonstrate the effectiveness of the new adaptive law. In this study, we extend the optimal control modification to include a covariance-like adjustment mechanism of a time-varying adaptive gain to prevent persistent learning which can reduce robustness. The covariance update law can also include a forgetting factor in a similar context as a standard recursive least-squares estimation algorithm. The covariance adaptive gain adjustment allows an initial large adaptive gain to be set arbitrarily and provides the ability to drive the adaptive gain to a lower value as the adaptation has achieved sufficiently the desired tracking performance. Alternatively, a normalized adaptive gain may be used to reduce adaptation when the amplitude of an input basis function becomes large. Flight control simulation results demonstrate that both approaches can achieve significant robustness as measured by the time delay margin. Furthermore, a recent flight test program of the optimal control modification with normalization on a NASA F-18 aircraft demonstrates the effectiveness of the adaptive law.
[1]
Michael Athans,et al.
Robustness of continuous-time adaptive control algorithms in the presence of unmodeled dynamics
,
1985
.
[2]
John J. Burken,et al.
Adaptive Flight Control Design with Optimal Control Modification on an F-18 Aircraft Model
,
2010
.
[3]
Ilhan Tuzcu,et al.
Aeroelastic Modeling and Adaptive Control of GTM
,
2010
.
[4]
John J. Burken,et al.
Handling Qualities Evaluations of Low Complexity Model Reference Adaptive Controllers for Reduced Pitch and Roll Damping Scenarios
,
2011
.
[5]
Nhan T. Nguyen,et al.
Asymptotic Linearity of Optimal Control Modification Adaptive Law with Analytical Stability Margins
,
2010
.
[6]
Jovan D. Boskovic,et al.
An Optimal Control Modification to Model-Reference Adaptive Control for Fast Adaptation
,
2008
.
[7]
Nhan T. Nguyen.
Verifiable Adaptive Control with Analytical Stability Margins by Optimal Control Modification
,
2010
.
[8]
Anthony J. Calise,et al.
A Loop Recovery Method for Adaptive Control
,
2009
.
[9]
K. Narendra,et al.
A New Adaptive Law for Robust Adaptation without Persistent Excitation
,
1986,
1986 American Control Conference.
[10]
Vahram Stepanyan,et al.
Optimal Control Modification for Robust Adaptation of Singularly Perturbed Systems with Slow Actuators
,
2009
.
[11]
Petros A. Ioannou,et al.
Robust Adaptive Control
,
2012
.
[12]
Nhan T. Nguyen,et al.
An Adaptive Control Simulation Study using Pilot Handling Qualities Evaluations
,
2010
.
[13]
Anthony J. Calise,et al.
Longitudinal Dynamics and Adaptive Control Application for an Aeroelastic Generic Transport Model
,
2011
.