Model validation for low and high superficial gas velocity bubble column flows

Abstract In the present work, gas–liquid flow dynamics in a bubble column are simulated with CFDLib using an Eulerian–Eulerian ensemble-averaging method in a two-dimensional Cartesian system. The two-phase flow simulations are compared to experimental measurements of a rectangular bubble column performed by Mudde et al. [1997. Role of coherent structures on Reynolds stresses in a 2-D bubble column. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 43, 913–926] and a cylindrical bubble column performed by Rampure et al. [2003. Modeling of gas–liquid/gas–liquid–solid flows in bubble columns: experiments and CFD simulations. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 81, 692–706] for low and high superficial gas velocities, respectively. The objectives are to obtain grid-independent numerical solutions using CFDLib to reconcile unphysical results observed using FLUENT with increasing grid resolutions [Law, D., Battaglia, F., Heindel, T.J., 2006. Numerical simulations of gas–liquid flow dynamics in bubble columns. In: Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division, IMECE2006-13544, Chicago, IL], and to validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with experimental data to demonstrate the use of numerical simulations as a viable design tool for gas–liquid bubble column flows. Numerical predictions are presented for the local time-averaged liquid velocity and gas fraction at various axial heights as a function of horizontal or radial position. The effects of grid resolution, bubble pressure (BP) model, and drag coefficient models on the numerical predictions are examined. The BP model is hypothesized to account for bubble stability, thus providing physical solutions.