Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix

Many models of Product Development (PD) are concerned with managing the decomposition and integration of tasks, teams and subsystems transforming a conceptual idea into a finished product. Specifically, a PD process is formed of cross-functional teams continuously exchanging information on specified tasks to integrate the product's final structure. Recently, it has been shown that large PD networks (e.g., tasks, teams, or components) follow a Scale Free structure. That is, each PD network included hubs that control information flow. Nevertheless, there is no literature on the implications of these findings on PD management. As a consequence, the objective of this paper is two-folded. First, we examine a set of mathematical measures such as centrality and brokerage used in Social Networks Analysis (SNA) to identify critical players in PD networks. Second, we link these findings to insights and recommendations for the management of complex PD organizational networks; in particular, detection and role designation of information leaders based on the given PD network structure

[1]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[2]  Manuel E. Sosa,et al.  Analyzing the Effects of Product Architecture on Technical Communication in Product Development Orga , 2000 .

[3]  R. F. Cancho,et al.  Topology of technology graphs: small world patterns in electronic circuits. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[5]  David I. Cleland,et al.  Field Guide to Project Management , 1997 .

[6]  Karen J. Richter,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Teams. Volume 1: Main Text , 1990 .

[7]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Designing the design process , 1990 .

[8]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[10]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[11]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  How Microsoft Makes Large Teams Work Like Small Teams , 1997 .

[12]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Engineering design management: An information structure approach , 1999 .

[13]  C. J. Haddad.  Operationalizing the concept of concurrent engineering: a case study from the US auto industry , 1996 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of My Life , 1991 .

[15]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[16]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  D. V. Steward.  Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design , 1981 .

[18]  S. Borgatti.  The Key Player Problem , 2002 .

[19]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Designing Modular and Integrative Systems , 2000 .

[21]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[22]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[24]  R. Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  Scale-free networks from optimal design , 2002, cond-mat/0204344.

[25]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[26]  Annouk Lievens,et al.  Communication flows in international product innovation teams , 2000 .

[27]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[28]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[29]  Stephen P. Borgatti.  Identifying sets of key players in a network , 2003, IEMC '03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37502).

[30]  Alberto J. Cividanes.  Optimal scheduling of design reviews in product development , 2002 .

[31]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[32]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[34]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The centrality of groups and classes , 1999 .

[35]  Thomas A. Salomone,et al.  What every engineer should know about concurrent engineering , 1995 .

[36]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web , 2000 .

[37]  S D Eppinger,et al.  Innovation at the speed of information. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[38]  R. Burt.  The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[39]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Characterizing complex product architectures , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[40]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[41]  Dan Braha,et al.  The Topology of Large-Scale Engineering Problem-Solving Networks , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Non-parametric standard errors and tests for network statistics , 1999 .

[43]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[44]  Roger Lipsett,et al.  Large Scale Design , 1989 .

[45]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Patterns of Product Development Interactions , 2002 .

[46]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Creativity and technological learning: the roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects , 2000 .

[47]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Data , 1994 .

[49]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[50]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.