Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States.

OBJECTIVE To assess outcomes of medication abortion provided through telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at Planned Parenthood health centers in four U.S. states. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed electronic health records for patients receiving telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at 26 health centers in Alaska, Idaho, Nevada, and Washington from April 2017 to March 2018. All patients had on-site ultrasound scans, laboratory testing, and counseling and provided informed consent before meeting with the clinician. Telemedicine patients met with a clinician by secure videoconference platform; standard patients met with a clinician in person. We also reviewed adverse event reports submitted during this period. Study outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, receipt of or referral for aspiration procedure, and clinically significant adverse events. To compare outcomes between the telemedicine and standard groups, we performed logistic regression accounting for gestational age and health center clustering. RESULTS A total of 5,952 patients underwent medication abortion (738 telemedicine and 5,214 standard). Mean gestational age was 50.4 days for telemedicine patients compared with 48.9 days for standard patients (prevalence ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03). We had outcome data for 4,456 (74.9%) patients; follow-up within 45 days of abortion was lower among telemedicine patients (60.3%) than standard patients (76.9%) (prevalence ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.78-0.88). Among patients with follow-up data, ongoing pregnancy was less common among telemedicine patients (2/445, 0.5%) than standard patients (71/4,011, 1.8%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.23; 95% CI 0.14-0.39). Aspiration procedures were less common among telemedicine patients (6/445, 1.4%) than standard patients (182/4,011, 4.5%) (adjusted OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.17-0.46). Fewer than 1% of patients in each group reported clinically significant adverse events. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSION Findings from this study conducted across geographically diverse settings support existing evidence that outcomes for medication abortion provided through telemedicine are comparable with standard provision of medication abortion. Differences in observed outcomes may be due to differential follow-up between groups.

[1]  J. Potter,et al.  Rapid response to evaluate policy: Assessing changes in medical abortion using real-time data collection from Texas abortion providers , 2018, Contraception.

[2]  N. Johns,et al.  Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  J. Bearak,et al.  Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis , 2017, The Lancet. Public health.

[4]  D. Grossman,et al.  Safety of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine Compared With In Person. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  D. Grossman,et al.  Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: Through the provider’s lens , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  J. Jerman,et al.  Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States , 2017, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[7]  Alisa B. Busch,et al.  Rapid Growth In Mental Health Telemedicine Use Among Rural Medicare Beneficiaries, Wide Variation Across States. , 2017, Health affairs.

[8]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014 , 2017, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[9]  J. Potter,et al.  Women’s Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Clemens Scott Kruse,et al.  Telemedicine Use in Rural Native American Communities in the Era of the ACA: a Systematic Literature Review , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[11]  Melissa J. Chen,et al.  Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Secondary Measures of Access to Abortion Services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: Gestational Age Limits, Cost, and Harassment , 2014, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[13]  M. Cheyney,et al.  Navigating Social and Institutional Obstacles , 2014, Qualitative health research.

[14]  David J. Wallace,et al.  Adoption of ICU Telemedicine in the United States , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[15]  K. Lane,et al.  Effectiveness and Acceptability of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.