Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making

The somatic marker hypothesis formulated by Damasio (e.g., 1994; Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 1991) argues that affective reactions ordinarily guide and simplify decision making. Although originally intended to explain decision-making deficits in people with specific frontal lobe damage, the hypothesis also applies to decision-making problems in populations without brain injury. Subsequently, the gambling task was developed by Bechara (Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, & Anderson, 1994) as a diagnostic test of decision-making deficit in neurological populations. More recently, the gambling task has been used to explore implications of the somatic marker hypothesis, as well as to study suboptimal decision making in a variety of domains. We examined relations among gambling task decision making, working memory (WM) load, and somatic markers in a modified version of the gambling task. Increased WM load produced by secondary tasks led to poorer gambling performance. Declines in gambling performance were associated with the absence of the affective reactions that anticipate choice outcomes and guide future decision making. Our experiments provide evidence that WM processes contribute to the development of somatic markers. If WM functioning is taxed, somatic markers may not develop, and decision making may thereby suffer.

[1]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Intact electrodermal skin conductance responses after bilateral amygdala damage , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Benton,et al.  Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction , 1991 .

[4]  A. Damasio,et al.  Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. , 1991 .

[5]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[6]  Margaret Toms,et al.  Working Memory and Conditional Reasoning , 1993 .

[7]  E. Barratt.  Impulsiveness and aggression. , 1994 .

[8]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[9]  A. Damasio.  Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[10]  M. Lezak.  Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[11]  J. Patton,et al.  Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. , 1995, Journal of clinical psychology.

[12]  G. Fricchione.  Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[13]  J. Richardson,et al.  Working Memory and Human Cognition , 1996 .

[14]  A. Damasio.  The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  A. Damasio,et al.  Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  John T. E. Richardson.  Evolving Issues in Working Memory , 1996 .

[17]  A. Baddeley.  Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[18]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[19]  W K Bickel,et al.  Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. , 1997, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[20]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies , 1997 .

[21]  H. Damasio,et al.  Dissociation Of Working Memory from Decision Making within the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  W. Bickel,et al.  Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. , 1998, Addiction.

[23]  A Baddeley,et al.  Random Generation and the Executive Control of Working Memory , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  J. Evenden.  Varieties of impulsivity , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  D. Lykken,et al.  Individual differences in electrodermal responsivity to predictable aversive stimuli and substance dependence. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A Biologically Based Computational Model of Working Memory , 1999 .

[28]  Evian Gordon,et al.  Electrodermal activity in schizophrenia: a quantitative study using a short interstimulus paradigm , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Working memory, executive processes and the effects of alcohol on Go/No-Go learning: testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable Deficits in the Decision-Making Cognition of Chronic Amphetamine Abusers, Opiate Abusers, Patients with Focal Damage to Prefrontal Cortex, and Tryptophan-Depleted Normal Volunteers: Evidence for Monoaminergic Mechanisms , 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[32]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Carlo Contoreggi,et al.  Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.). , 2000 .

[35]  H. Damasio,et al.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  A. Damasio,et al.  Decision making and the somatic marker hypothesis , 2000 .

[38]  M. Gazzaniga.  The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[39]  Steven W Anderson,et al.  Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  W. Bickel,et al.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. , 2001, Addiction.

[41]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  M. Siepmann,et al.  The effects of reboxetine on autonomic and cognitive functions in healthy volunteers , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[44]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision making and neuropsychiatry , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  A. Bechara,et al.  Neurobiology of decision-making: risk and reward. , 2001, Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry.

[47]  Kimberly L. Napier,et al.  Three decision-making tasks in cocaine-dependent patients: do they measure the same construct? , 2001, Addiction.

[48]  A. Bechara,et al.  Decision-making and addiction (part II): myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  [Cognitive functions of the frontal lobe]. , 2004, Revista de neurologia.

[51]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .