Investigation of chest injury mechanism caused by different seatbelt loads in frontal impact.

PURPOSE The purpose of this quantitative study is to investigate the differences of the injury mechanism caused by two different types of seatbelt loads on the occupant's chest. METHODS The finite element analysis is employed to compare the different responses of the human body model, including comparison of kinematics, chest accelerations, seatbelt forces and chest injury outcomes regarding chest deflections and rib fractures. RESULTS The calculated rib strain-stress response from simulations in force-limiting seatbelt are higher than that in the regular seatbelt. The forward movement and torso twist are both great in simulations with force-limiting seatbelt. Moreover, there are obvious differences in the injury outcomes of chest deflections and rib fracture risks under the different seatbelt loads. CONCLUSION Results indicate that the chest deflections and rib fracture risks are negatively correlated under the load of the force-limiting seatbelt, However, they are positively correlated to and determined by the seatbelt peak load of the regular seatbelt. This paper can provide a reference for study of the chest injury mechanism and protection efficiency of seatbelt.

[1]  Richard Kent,et al.  Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[2]  J. Crandall,et al.  Validation of Shoulder Response of Human Body Finite-Element Model (GHBMC) Under Whole Body Lateral Impact Condition , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Ola Boström,et al.  Benefits of a 3+2 point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes , 2003 .

[4]  F A Pintar,et al.  Identification of vehicle components associated with severe thoracic injury in motor vehicle crashes: a CIREN and NASS analysis. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  N White Rangarajan.  DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF THE THOR ADVANCED FRONTAL CRASH TEST DUMMY THORAX AND ABDOMEN ASSEMBLIES , 1998 .

[6]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  J. Crandall,et al.  Comparison of Kinematics of GHBMC to PMHS on the Side Impact Condition , 2013 .

[8]  J. Crandall,et al.  Thoracic Response to Shoulder Belt Loading: Investigation of Chest Stiffness and Longitudinal Strain Pattern of Ribs , 2009 .

[9]  J. Crandall,et al.  Rib fractures under anterior-posterior dynamic loads: experimental and finite-element study. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Krystoffer Mroz,et al.  Predicting rib fracture risk with whole-body finite element models: development and preliminary evaluation of a probabilistic analytical framework. , 2012, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[11]  Celina Pezowicz,et al.  The mechanical properties of human ribs in young adult. , 2012, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[12]  Laura J. Freeman,et al.  The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[13]  Lex van Rooij,et al.  Validation of a finite element human model for prediction of rib fractures , 2007 .

[14]  J. Crandall,et al.  Effect of Contact Friction between Seatbelt and Human Body Model on Simulation of Rib Fracture in Frontal Impact , 2016, 2016 Eighth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA).

[15]  Gordon R. Plank,et al.  ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF DRIVER THORACIC RESPONSE TO OUT OF POSITION AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT , 1998 .

[16]  Greg Shaw,et al.  Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[17]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  J. Forman,et al.  Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research , 2011, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  Karol Miller,et al.  Numerical investigations of rib fracture failure models in different dynamic loading conditions , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[20]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Age-related Changes in the Effective Stiffness of the Human Thorax Using Four Loading Conditions , 2003 .

[21]  Zuoping Li,et al.  Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  Sen Xiao,et al.  Analysis of chest injury in frontal impact via finite element modelling based on biomechanical experiment , 2017 .

[23]  Toshikazu Torigaki,et al.  Finite element analysis of hard and soft tissue contributions to thoracic response: sensitivity analysis of fluctuations in boundary conditions. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[24]  John W. Melvin,et al.  AGE EFFECTS ON THORACIC INJURY TOLERANCE , 1996 .

[25]  L Evans,et al.  Airbag effectiveness in preventing fatalities predicted according to type of crash, driver age, and blood alcohol concentration. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Joel D. Stitzel,et al.  Development of the global human body models consortium mid-sized male full body model , 2011 .

[27]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention. 2nd Ed. , 2003 .