Sound Finder: a new software approach for localizing animals recorded with a microphone array

Acoustic localization is a powerful technique for monitoring the positions, movements and behaviours of terrestrial animals. However, its prevalence in biological studies has been constrained by hardware and software that are custom-built, expensive and difficult to use. We recently helped to relieve the hardware constraint by describing a microphone array that is affordable, portable, easy to use and commercially available. Here, we help to relieve the software constraint by developing an acoustic localization program called “Sound Finder”, which is easy to use, freely available and accurate for a variety of animals and recording conditions. It runs in the free software environment R, and in spreadsheet programs such as Microsoft Excel and the open-source software LibreOffice. In this study, we describe how Sound Finder functions, and then test its accuracy by localizing natural sounds that were broadcast through loudspeakers and re-recorded with microphone arrays. We quantify Sound Finder's accuracy by comparing its location estimates with known loudspeaker locations and with output from other localization approaches. We show that Sound Finder generates accurate location estimates for a variety of animal sounds, microphone array configurations and environmental conditions. Furthermore, Sound Finder generates an error value that allows the user to assess its accuracy. In conclusion, Sound Finder provides accurate estimates of a vocalizing animal's location. It is easy to use, requires only widespread and affordable software and is freely available in a standard form as Supplementary material to this article.

[1]  S. Sakai,et al.  Findings on spatial foraging patterns of bumblebees (Bombus ignitus) from a bee-tracking experiment in a net cage , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Charles E Taylor,et al.  Acoustic localization of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using a wireless sensor network. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Andreas M. Ali,et al.  Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus , 2011 .

[4]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback , 2008, Current Biology.

[5]  Elizabeth A. MacDougall-Shackleton,et al.  Spatial and age-related variation in use of locally common song elements in dawn singing of song sparrows Melospiza melodia: old males sing the hits , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  S. Bancroft An Algebraic Solution of the GPS Equations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  A. Cockburn,et al.  Pre–dawn infidelity: females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy–wrens , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Mennill Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour , 2011 .

[9]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour , 2012 .

[10]  W. M. Schleidt,et al.  Localization of sound producing animals using the arrival time differences of their signals at an array of microphones , 2005, Experientia.

[11]  Christopher Niezrecki,et al.  Manatee position estimation by passive acoustic localization. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Richard James,et al.  Automated mapping of social networks in wild birds , 2012, Current Biology.

[13]  Kurt M Fristrup,et al.  Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  John McDonough,et al.  Distant Speech Recognition , 2009 .

[15]  J. Spiesberger,et al.  Passive Localization of Calling Animals and Sensing of their Acoustic Environment Using Acoustic Tomography , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Franz Goller,et al.  On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in birdsong , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  A critical analysis of ‘false-feeding’ behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird: disturbance effects, satiated nestlings or deception? , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  L. David Mech,et al.  A critique of wildlife radio-tracking and its use in national parks: a report to the National Park Service , 2002 .