Standardized static and dynamic evaluation of myocardial tissue properties

INTRODUCTION Quantifying the mechanical behaviors of soft biological tissues is of considerable research interest. However, validity and reproducibility between different researchers and apparatus is questionable. This study aims to quantify the mechanical properties of myocardium while investigating methodologies that can standardize biological tissue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tensile testing was performed to obtain Young's modulus and a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) determined the viscoelastic properties. A frequency range of 0.5 Hz (30bpm) to 3.5 Hz (210bpm) was analyzed. For tensile testing three different preconditioning settings were tested: no load, 0.05 N preload, and a cyclic preload at 2.5% strain and 10 cycles. Samples were placed in saline and tested at 37 °C. Five ovine and five porcine hearts were tested. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Cyclic loading results in the most consistent moduli values. The modulus of ovine/porcine tissue was mean = 0.05/.06 MPa, SD = 0.02/0.03 MPa. The storage/loss modulus varied from = 0.02/0.003 MPa at 0.5 Hz to 0.04/0.008 MPa at 3.5 Hz; Stiffness increases linearly from 400 to 800 N m-1 with a tan delta around 0.175. CONCLUSIONS Static analysis of the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue confirms that; preconditioning is necessary for reproducibility, and DMA provides a platform for reproducible testing of soft biological tissues.

[1]  Kevin L Troyer,et al.  Viscoelastic effects during loading play an integral role in soft tissue mechanics. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  Gerhard Sommer,et al.  3D constitutive modeling of the biaxial mechanical response of intact and layer-dissected human carotid arteries. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  ScienceDirect Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing , 1996 .

[4]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  W. O’Brien,et al.  Young's modulus measurements of soft tissues with application to elasticity imaging , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  D K Bogen,et al.  Changes in passive mechanical stiffness of myocardial tissue with aneurysm formation. , 1994, Circulation.

[7]  Yiming Wu,et al.  Altered Titin Expression, Myocardial Stiffness, and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy , 2004, Circulation.

[8]  渡邉 哲史 Myocardial stiffness is an important determinant of the plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with both diastolic and systolic heart failure , 2006 .

[9]  Alireza Karimi,et al.  Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[10]  Y Lanir,et al.  Time-dependent mechanical behavior of sheep digital tendons, including the effects of preconditioning. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  R. Guldberg,et al.  Compressive cyclic ratcheting and fatigue of synthetic, soft biomedical polymers in solution. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[12]  Colin Berry,et al.  A numerical study of a heart phantom model , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[13]  M. Frenneaux,et al.  The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: from molecular mechanisms to exercise haemodynamics. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  Robert Langer,et al.  A Blood-Resistant Surgical Glue for Minimally Invasive Repair of Vessels and Heart Defects , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[15]  Tusit Weerasooriya,et al.  Dynamic and quasi-static compressive response of porcine muscle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  A Haverich,et al.  In vitro engineering of heart muscle: artificial myocardial tissue. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Gerhard A Holzapfel,et al.  Constitutive modelling of passive myocardium: a structurally based framework for material characterization , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  P. Hoskins,et al.  Measurement of arterial stiffness in subjects with vascular disease: Are vessel wall changes more sensitive than increase in intima-media thickness? , 2009, Atherosclerosis.

[19]  I. Vesely,et al.  Role of Preconditioning and Recovery Time in Repeated Testing of Aortic Valve Tissues: Validation Through Quasilinear Viscoelastic Theory , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M Sugawara,et al.  Myocardial stiffness derived from end-systolic wall stress and logarithm of reciprocal of wall thickness. Contractility index independent of ventricular size. , 1990, Circulation.

[21]  J. G. Pinto,et al.  Visco-elasticity of passive cardiac muscle. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  W. Cook,et al.  Synthesis, characterization and properties of biocompatible poly(glycerol sebacate) pre‐polymer and gel , 2013 .

[23]  Ivan Vesely,et al.  Stress Relaxation Preconditioning of Porcine Aortic Valves , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  M. Sacks,et al.  A method for planar biaxial mechanical testing that includes in-plane shear. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  G. Guinea,et al.  Mechanical properties of human coronary arteries , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[26]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[27]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS): A review , 2012 .

[28]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  The effects of preconditioning strain on measured tissue properties. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  S. Woo,et al.  Mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments. I. Quasi-static and nonlinear viscoelastic properties. , 1982, Biorheology.

[30]  Mathieu Couade,et al.  Mapping Myocardial Fiber Orientation Using Echocardiography-Based Shear Wave Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[32]  Subir Bhatia,et al.  Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Porcine Lacrimal Canaliculus , 2007, Current Eye Research.

[33]  Edoardo Mazza,et al.  Dynamic Measurements of Soft Tissue Viscoelastic Properties with a Torsional Resonator Device , 2004, MICCAI.

[34]  Romuald Będziński,et al.  Mechanical, rheological, fatigue, and degradation behavior of PLLA, PGLA and PDGLA as materials for vascular implants , 2013 .

[35]  Yanhang Zhang,et al.  Changes in the mechanical and biochemical properties of aortic tissue due to cold storage. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[36]  Robert Kilger,et al.  A comparison of the quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties of the human semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[37]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Mechanics of fresh, refrigerated, and frozen arterial tissue. , 2007, The Journal of surgical research.

[38]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of short coir fiber reinforced natural rubber composites , 2005 .

[39]  R. Reis,et al.  Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in Polymers for Medical Applications , 2002 .

[40]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .