In vitro and in silico affinity fingerprints: Finding similarities beyond structural classes

In this article, we review the use of in vitro and in silico affinity fingerprints as novel descriptors for similarity searches in molecular databases and QSAR analyses. An affinity fingerprint for a particular molecule is constructed as a vector of either its binding affinities, docking scores or superpositioning pseudo energies against a reference panel of proteins or small molecules. In contrast to most other molecular descriptors, affinity fingerprints are not directly derived from molecular structures. As such, they offer the possibility to detect similarities amongst molecules independent of their structural scaffolds. In this report we introduce the Flexsim-S method, an extension of our previous work on virtual affinity fingerprints. Moreover, we demonstrate that virtual affinity fingerprint methods are comparable to some popular two-dimensional descriptors in terms of correctly classifying compounds, but complementary with respect to the particular search results (hit lists).

[1]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  ITERATIVE PARTIAL EQUALIZATION OF ORBITAL ELECTRONEGATIVITY – A RAPID ACCESS TO ATOMIC CHARGES , 1980 .

[3]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Marvin Johnson,et al.  Concepts and applications of molecular similarity , 1990 .

[5]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[6]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Molecular docking using shape descriptors , 1992 .

[7]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action. , 1992, Science.

[8]  A. Leo CALCULATING LOG POCT FROM STRUCTURES , 1993 .

[9]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[10]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  Use of Structure-Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Robert D Clark,et al.  Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular similarity based on DOCK-generated fingerprints. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  H. Matter,et al.  Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  RigFit: A new approach to superimposing ligand molecules , 1998, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[16]  G. S. Johnson,et al.  An Information-Intensive Approach to the Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer , 1997, Science.

[17]  C. Lemmen,et al.  FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Feature trees: A new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[19]  Steven L. Dixon,et al.  Bioactive Diversity and Screening Library Selection via Affinity Fingerprinting , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[20]  A. N. Jain,et al.  Molecular hashkeys: a novel method for molecular characterization and its application for predicting important pharmaceutical properties of molecules. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  Hans Briem,et al.  Flexsim-X: A Method for the Detection of Molecules with Similar Biological Activity , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..