Public Opposition to Nuclear Energy: Retrospect and Prospect

liance upon fossil fuels. While President Carter has ostensibly demoted nuclear energy to a secondary status and has opposed the deployment of the breeder reactor, the energy conservation program, the envisioned acceleration of coal production, and the envisioned synthetic fuels effort may well fail to fill the void. It is entirely possible that nuclear energy will, after a hiatus, regain its favored status.

[1]  C. Holden.  Religious groups unite behind banner of conservation, renewable energy sources. , 1980, Science.

[2]  C. Hohenemser,et al.  Institutional responses to Three Mile Island , 1979 .

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power , 1979 .

[4]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Nuclear knowledge and nuclear attitudes: is ignorance bliss , 1978 .

[5]  R. Mitchell.  Public speaks again: a new environmental survey , 1978 .

[6]  A. Mazur,et al.  Controversy over a Local Nuclear Waste Repository , 1978 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[8]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Citizens' views about the proposed Hartsville Nuclear Power Plant: a survey of residents' perceptions in August 1975 , 1977 .

[9]  Alvin M. Weinberg.  Is nuclear energy acceptable , 1977 .

[10]  C Hohenemser,et al.  The distrust of nuclear power. , 1977, Science.

[11]  H. J. Otway,et al.  The Determinants of Attitude Formation: An Application to Nuclear Power , 1976 .

[12]  Robert Jay Lifton,et al.  Nuclear energy and the wisdom of the body , 1976 .

[13]  P. Pahner.  A Psychological Perspective of the Nuclear Energy Controversy , 1976 .

[14]  A. Weinberg.  The maturity and future of nuclear energy , 1976 .

[15]  T. Mattingly,et al.  Critical mass: politics, technology, and the public interest , 1976 .

[16]  D. Metlay,et al.  Technology Observed: Attitudes of a Wary Public , 1975, Science.

[17]  W. E. Cooper,et al.  Nuclear vessels are safe , 1975 .

[18]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Opposition to technological innovation , 1975 .

[19]  J. Primack,et al.  Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena , 1975 .

[20]  F. Buttel,et al.  The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement, 1968-1970. , 1974 .

[21]  W. B. Cottrell.  ECCS rule-making hearing , 1974 .

[22]  Colin Norman,et al.  Nuclear safety , 1974, Nature.

[23]  R. Gillette.  Nuclear Safety (IV): Barriers to Communication. , 1972, Science.

[24]  R. Gillette.  Nuclear Safety (II): The Years of Delay. , 1972, Science.

[25]  R Gillette.  Nuclear safety (I): the roots of dissent. , 1972, Science.

[26]  J. Mueller,et al.  Trends in Popular Support for the Wars in Korea and Vietnam , 1971, American Political Science Review.

[27]  D. Nelkin.  Nuclear Power and Its Critics; The Cayuga Lake Controversy. , 1971 .

[28]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[29]  M. Parsons.  The Sierra Club , 1910 .