Auditory processing of interaural timing information: New insights

Differences in the time‐of‐arrival of sounds at the two ears, or interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), constitute one of the major binaural cues that underlie our ability to localize sounds in space. In addition, ITDs contribute to our ability to detect and to discriminate sounds, such as speech, in noisy environments. For low‐frequency signals, ITDs are conveyed primarily by “cycle‐by‐cycle” disparities present in the fine‐structure of the waveform. For high‐frequency signals, ITDs are conveyed by disparities within the time‐varying amplitude, or envelope, of the waveform. The results of laboratory studies conducted over the past few decades indicate that ITDs within the envelopes of high‐frequency are less potent than those within the fine‐structure of low‐frequency stimuli. This is true for both measures of sensitivity to changes in ITD and for measures of the extent of the perceived lateral displacement of sounds containing ITDs. Colburn and Esquissaud ( 1976 ) hypothesized that it is differences in the specific aspects of the waveform that are coded neurally within each monaural (single ear) channel that account for the greater potency of ITDs at low frequencies rather than any differences in the more central binaural mechanisms that serve these different frequency regions. In this review, the results of new studies are reported that employed special high‐frequency “transposed” stimuli that were designed to provide the high‐frequency channels of the binaural processor with envelope‐based information that mimics waveform‐based information normally available only in low‐frequency channels. The results demonstrate that these high‐frequency transposed stimuli (1) yield sensitivity to ITDs that approaches, or is equivalent to, that obtained with “conventional” low‐frequency stimuli and (2) yield large extents of laterality that are similar to those measured with conventional low‐frequency stimuli. These findings suggest that by providing the high‐frequency channels of the binaural processor with information that mimics that normally available only at low frequencies, the potency of ITDs in the two frequency regions can be made to be similar, if not identical. These outcomes provide strong support for Colburn and Esquissaud's ( 1976 ) hypothesis. The use of high‐frequency transposed stimuli, in both behavioral and physiological investigations offers the promise of new and important insights into the nature of binaural processing. J Neurosci. Res. 66:1035–1046, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E. C. Cherry,et al.  Mechanism of Binaural Fusion in the Hearing of Speech , 1957 .

[2]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[3]  T. F. Weiss,et al.  A comparison of synchronization filters in different auditory receptor organs , 1988, Hearing Research.

[4]  William A. Yost Lateral position of sinusoids presented with interaural intensive and temporal differences , 1981 .

[5]  C. Cherry,et al.  Binaural Fusion of Low‐ and High‐Frequency Sounds , 1958 .

[6]  S van de Par,et al.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of bands of noise and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and bandwidth. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of low-frequency tones and narrow bands of noise. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  H S Colburn,et al.  Lateral position and interaural discrimination. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. Palmer,et al.  Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.

[12]  G. Henning,et al.  The effect of carrier and modulation frequency on lateralization based on interaural phase and interaural group delay , 1981, Hearing Research.

[13]  G. Henning Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Nuetzel,et al.  Lateralization of complex waveforms: effects of fine structure, amplitude, and duration. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  H. S. Colburn,et al.  An auditory‐nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high‐frequency complex stimuli , 1976 .

[16]  R. G. Klumpp,et al.  Some Measurements of Interaural Time Difference Thresholds , 1956 .

[17]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of low-frequency, complex waveforms: the use of envelope-based temporal disparities. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Role of Interaural Time and Intensity Differences in the Lateralization of Low‐Frequency Tones , 1959 .

[19]  Constantine Trahiotis,et al.  Detection of interaural delay in high‐frequency noise , 1981 .

[20]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[21]  T. Yin,et al.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  G. Henning,et al.  Some observations on the lateralization of complex waveforms. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  G. Henning Lateralization and the binaural masking-level difference. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R. Batra,et al.  High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  B. McA. Sayers,et al.  Acoustic‐Image Lateralization Judgments with Binaural Transients , 1964 .

[26]  Tom C. T. Yin,et al.  Physiological Studies of Directional Hearing , 1983 .

[27]  Newman Guttman,et al.  Binaural Interaction of High‐Frequency Complex Stimuli , 1959 .

[28]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and temporal variation. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Just Noticeable Differences in Dichotic Phase , 1956 .

[30]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  G. Bruce Henning,et al.  Lateralization of low-frequency transients , 1983, Hearing Research.

[32]  D. McFadden,et al.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.