Directionality of transitions in space: Diverging trajectories of electric mobility and autonomous driving in urban and rural settlement structures

Abstract How does the spatial context shape early innovation trajectories and how will this influence the directionality of transitions? We elaborate these questions for the case of transitions in personal mobility, focusing on emerging trajectories of electric vehicles and autonomous driving. We analyze how the dynamics depend on whether innovation and transition strategies are primarily geared towards urban or rural contexts. In order to identify potentially diverging trajectories, we specify socio-technical regime structures at two levels: the level of service regimes (i.e. rules that relate to specific means of transport, like the car) and the level of the sectoral regime (i.e. rules that regulate the interplay between the different service regimes). We will show that depending on whether the early innovation strategies are oriented at rural or urban contexts, quite different directionalities can result both regarding the technological trajectory of the new service option, but also regarding the overall sector configuration.

[1]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[2]  Paul Andre Henri Francois Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Urban, sub-urban or rural: where is the best place for electric vehicles? , 2014 .

[3]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[4]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom , 2018, Journal of Transport Geography.

[5]  M. Givoni,et al.  The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes , 2015 .

[6]  Karoline Augenstein Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility – The case of Germany , 2015 .

[7]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs , 2018 .

[8]  James T. Murphy Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections , 2015 .

[9]  Andreas Knie,et al.  Mobility in the age of digital modernity: why the private car is losing its significance, intermodal transport is winning and why digitalisation is the key , 2016 .

[10]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The governance of smart mobility , 2017, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[11]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[12]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[13]  Robin Hickman,et al.  Transitions to Low Carbon Transport Futures. Strategic Conversations from London and Delhi , 2011 .

[14]  Susanne Ernst,et al.  Neue autoMobilität II. Kooperativer Straßenverkehr und intelligente Verkehrssteuerung für die Mobilität der Zukunft , 2019 .

[15]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Temporal echoes and cross-geography policy effects: Multiple levels of transition governance and the electric vehicle breakthrough , 2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[16]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory , 2014 .

[17]  Johan Schot,et al.  Towards a novel regime change framework: Studying mobility transitions in public transport regimes in an Indian megacity , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[18]  Samuel Labi,et al.  An empirical discourse on forecasting the use of autonomous vehicles using consumers’ preferences , 2020 .

[19]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[20]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[21]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling , 2018, Transport Reviews.

[22]  P. Plötz,et al.  Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany , 2014 .

[23]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Autonomous Driving - The Impact of Vehicle Automation on Mobility Behaviour , 2016 .

[24]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[25]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Automatisiertes Fahren , 2018, TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis.

[26]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Automobility in transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport , 2012 .

[27]  Graham Currie,et al.  Causes of Youth Licensing Decline: A Synthesis of Evidence , 2013 .

[28]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[29]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Towards sustainable urban basic services in low-income countries: A Technological Innovation System analysis of sanitation value chains in Nairobi , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[30]  Raphael Hoerler,et al.  Will consumers prefer shared and pooled-use autonomous vehicles? A stated choice experiment with Swiss households , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[31]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[32]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Rethinking the spatiality of Nordic electric vehicles and their popularity in urban environments: Moving beyond the city? , 2020, Journal of Transport Geography.

[33]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[34]  Jens Schippl,et al.  Stakeholders’ Views on Multimodal Urban Mobility Futures: A Matter of Policy Interventions or Just the Logical Result of Digitalization? , 2020 .

[35]  Paul Pfaffenbichler,et al.  The potential impacts of automated cars on urban transport: An exploratory analysis , 2020, Transport Policy.

[36]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility , 2015 .

[37]  David Banister,et al.  Participatory visioning in transport backcasting studies: Methodological lessons from Andalusia (Spain) , 2017 .

[38]  L. Whitmarsh How useful is the Multi-Level Perspective for transport and sustainability research? , 2012 .

[39]  Jens Schippl,et al.  User Perceptions and Attitudes on Sustainable Urban Transport among Young Adults: Findings from Copenhagen, Budapest and Karlsruhe , 2014 .

[40]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni , 2018, TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis.

[41]  Christian Binz,et al.  Global socio-technical regimes , 2018 .

[42]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity , 2019, Research Policy.

[43]  A. Grunwald Technology Assessment in Practice and Theory , 2018 .

[44]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Foresight tackling societal challenges: Impacts and implications on policy-making , 2011 .

[45]  Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al.  Promise of the obsolete: expectations for and experiments with self-driving vehicles in Norway , 2020, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy.

[46]  Jens Schippl,et al.  Decentering technology in technology assessment : . Prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany , 2017 .

[47]  David Banister,et al.  Sustainable Mobility at Thirty , 2019, Sustainability.

[48]  Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,et al.  Different Pathways for Achieving Cleaner Urban Areas: A Roadmap towards the White Paper Goal for Urban Transport☆ , 2016 .

[49]  Tom Cohen,et al.  Reframing the governance of automotive automation: insights from UK stakeholder workshops , 2018, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[50]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Geographies of transition—From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda , 2020 .

[51]  Alexander Paulsson,et al.  Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki , 2019 .

[52]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: The case of Nairobi's splintered sanitation regime , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[53]  Tim Schwanen,et al.  Automated Mobility Transitions: Governing Processes in the UK , 2018 .

[54]  Renato J. Orsato,et al.  The emergence of an electric mobility trajectory , 2013 .

[55]  Scapolo Fabiana,et al.  Future-Oriented Technology Analysis , 2008 .