The White Matter Structural Network Underlying Human Tool Use and Tool Understanding

The ability to recognize, create, and use complex tools is a milestone in human evolution. Widely distributed brain regions in parietal, frontal, and temporal cortices have been implicated in using and understanding tools, but the roles of their anatomical connections in supporting tool use and tool conceptual behaviors are unclear. Using deterministic fiber tracking in healthy participants, we first examined how 14 cortical regions that are consistently activated by tool processing are connected by white matter (WM) tracts. The relationship between the integrity of each of the 33 obtained tracts and tool processing deficits across 86 brain-damaged patients was investigated. WM tract integrity was measured with both lesion percentage (structural imaging) and mean fractional anisotropy (FA) values (diffusion imaging). Behavioral abilities were assessed by a tool use task, a range of conceptual tasks, and control tasks. We found that three left hemisphere tracts connecting frontoparietal and intrafrontal areas overlapping with left superior longitudinal fasciculus are crucial for tool use such that larger lesion and lower mean FA values on these tracts were associated with more severe tool use deficits. These tracts and five additional left hemisphere tracts connecting frontal and temporal/parietal regions, mainly overlapping with left superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior frontooccipital fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, and anterior thalamic radiation, are crucial for tool concept processing. Largely consistent results were also obtained using voxel-based symptom mapping analyses. Our results revealed the WM structural networks that support the use and conceptual understanding of tools, providing evidence for the anatomical skeleton of the tool knowledge network.

[1]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Neural bases of imitation and pantomime in acute stroke patients: distinct streams for praxis. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[7]  Ashwin G Ramayya,et al.  A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[10]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  T Shallice,et al.  A Form of Ideational Apraxia as a Delective Deficit of Contention Scheduling , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[16]  董瑞国,et al.  Aphasia , 2003, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[17]  E. Brunner,et al.  The Nonparametric Behrens‐Fisher Problem: Asymptotic Theory and a Small‐Sample Approximation , 2000 .

[18]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: Analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  Andrew J. Saykin,et al.  Optimization of seed density in DTI tractography for structural networks , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The neural basis of human tool use , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[21]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Predicting Conceptual Processing Capacity from Spontaneous Neuronal Activity of the Left Middle Temporal Gyrus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Sentence processing and verbal working memory in a white-matter-disconnection patient , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Gaolang Gong,et al.  White matter pathway supporting phonological encoding in speech production: a multi-modal imaging study of brain damage patients , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[24]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Comparing patients' predicted test scores from a regression equation with their obtained scores: a significance test and point estimate of abnormality with accompanying confidence limits. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[26]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Distinct Regions of Right Temporal Cortex Are Associated with Biological and Human–Agent Motion: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Neuropsychological Evidence , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  The neural basis of tool use. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Brain Regions That Represent Amodal Conceptual Knowledge , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  JamesW. Lewis Cortical Networks Related to Human Use of Tools , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[31]  G. Goldenberg Challenging traditions in apraxia. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[33]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Pengfei Xu,et al.  PANDA: a pipeline toolbox for analyzing brain diffusion images , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Volkmar Glauche,et al.  Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[38]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  K. Patterson,et al.  Deficits of knowledge vs . executive control in semantic cognition : Insights from cued naming , 2008 .

[40]  Elizabeth Rochon,et al.  Whole‐brain white matter disruption in semantic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Kwangsun Yoo,et al.  Tool-use practice induces changes in intrinsic functional connectivity of parietal areas , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[43]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[44]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Syntactic Processing Depends on Dorsal Language Tracts , 2011, Neuron.

[45]  T. Ingold,et al.  Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution , 1993 .

[46]  Yong Li,et al.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use , 2010, NeuroImage.

[47]  E. Renzi,et al.  Ideational apraxia: A quantitative study , 1968 .

[48]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The pipeline system for Octave and Matlab (PSOM): a lightweight scripting framework and execution engine for scientific workflows , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[50]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The dorsal stream contribution to phonological retrieval in object naming. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  R. Milo,et al.  Tools, language and cognition in human evolution , 1995, International Journal of Primatology.

[54]  Stephen E. Rose,et al.  The structure and connectivity of semantic memory in the healthy older adult brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[55]  Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: a study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  A. Caramazza,et al.  White matter structural connectivity underlying semantic processing: evidence from brain damaged patients. , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[58]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.