Active Flow Separation Control on a High-Lift Wing-Body Configuration Part 2: The Pulsed Blowing Application

This contribution discusses the implementation of active flow separation control for a 3D high-lift wing-body configuration under atmospheric low-speed wind tunnel conditions. The slot-actuators are applied on the suction side of the trailing edge flap to prevent local flow separation. It is the consequent progression of the work presented in Part 1 of this paper. The active flow control (AFC) method of choice is now the pulsed blowing. The experimental results indicate that this AFC technique is feasible for such applications with a global performance enhancement. Here, the wind tunnel findings are briefly discussed while the emphasis is given on the numerical investigations. The verification of the URANS approach points out that the global enhancement through AFC may easily be overestimated by insufficient numerical convergence. Thus, high computational requirements are needed for a consistent numerical evaluation. The computational results highlight the ability of pulsed blowing at moderate blowing momentum coefficients to suppress the flow separation on the trailing edge flap and support the global aerodynamic enhancement. The numerical results show an acceptable agreement with the experimental results for this AFC application.

[1]  Tobias Knopp The actuation boundary condition for flow control in the DLR TAU Code , 2011 .

[2]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  Active Flow Control on an Industry-Relevant Civil Aircraft Half Model , 2010 .

[3]  A. M. O. Smith,et al.  High-Lift Aerodynamics , 1975 .

[4]  Peter K. C. Rudolph,et al.  High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners , 1996 .

[5]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Large scale separation flow control experiments within the German Flow Control Network , 2009 .

[6]  W. Nitsche,et al.  On active control of high-lift flow , 1999 .

[7]  Robert King,et al.  Adaptive Closed-Loop Separation Control on a High-Lift Configuration Using Extremum Seeking , 2006 .

[8]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STEADY BLOWING ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL USING A DIFFERENTIAL REYNOLDS STRESS MODEL , 2009 .

[9]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[10]  Vlad Ciobaca Parameter study for a slatless 2D high-lift airfoil with active separation control using a URANS approach , 2013 .

[11]  W. Nitsche,et al.  LDV-Measurements on a High-Lift Configuration with Separation Control , 2000 .

[12]  W. Nitsche,et al.  Separation Control on a High-Lift Configuration by Periodic Exitation , 2002 .

[13]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Sweep Effect on Parameters Governing Control of Separation by Periodic Excitation , 1998 .

[14]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  Active separation control on the flap of a two-dimensional generic high-lift configuration , 2007 .

[15]  Thomas Gerhold,et al.  Overview of the Hybrid RANS Code TAU , 2005 .

[16]  R. Petz,et al.  ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL ON A HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATION BY A PERIODICALLY PULSATING JET , 2004 .