Frequency and Predictors of Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Saphenous Vein Bypass Graft Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Objectives We examined a large registry to determine the frequency and factors associated with drug-eluting stents (DES) use in saphenous vein graft (SVG) in contemporary practice. Background Prospective trials comparing DES with bare-metal stents in SVG lesions have provided conflicting conclusions regarding safety and efficacy leading to potential variation in stent choice for these lesions. Methods We analyzed the frequency and factors associated with DES use in patients undergoing SVG stenting from January 1, 2004, to March 31, 2009, in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression modeling was used to generate independent variables associated with DES use in SVGs. Results During the study period, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a SVG represented 5.7% of the total PCI volume (91,355 of 1,596,966). Of the 84,875 patients who received a SVG stent, a DES was used in 64.5%. From 2005 to 2009, DES use in SVG PCI changed from 80% to 62%. Unfractionated heparin was used in 46%, enoxaparin in 17%, bivalirudin in 42%, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 40% of cases. On multivariable analysis, several parameters (including the period, multivessel

[1]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  J. D. de Lemos,et al.  Contemporary use of embolic protection devices in saphenous vein graft interventions: Insights from the stenting of saphenous vein grafts trial , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Subhash Banerjee,et al.  Drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft interventions: a systematic review. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  B. Gersh,et al.  Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Peter L Duffy,et al.  Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  J. D. de Lemos,et al.  Clinical presentation and angiographic characteristics of saphenous vein graft failure after stenting: insights from the SOS (stenting of saphenous vein grafts) trial. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  J. D. de Lemos,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyA Randomized Controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Similar Bare-Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial , 2009 .

[8]  E. Brilakis,et al.  Should bare metal or drug‐eluting stents be used during PCI of saphenous vein graft lesions: Waiting for Godot? , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  L. Klein,et al.  Utilization of distal embolic protection in saphenous vein graft interventions (an analysis of 19,546 patients in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  S. Ellis "Crying fire in a theater" or a "confirmatory sighting?". , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  S. Pocock,et al.  Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Neville Kukreja,et al.  Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study , 2007, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Bruining,et al.  Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Patrick Hunziker,et al.  Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Lack of Benefit From Intravenous Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibition as Adjunctive Treatment for Percutaneous Interventions of Aortocoronary Bypass Grafts: A Pooled Analysis of Five Randomized Clinical Trials , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  H V Anderson,et al.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repository , 2001 .