Fluid–Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Computational modeling of heart valve dynamics incorporating both fluid dynamics and valve structural responses has been challenging. In this study, we developed a novel fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). A previously developed nonlinear finite element (FE) model of transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) was utilized to couple with SPH to simulate valve leaflet dynamics throughout the entire cardiac cycle. Comparative simulations were performed to investigate the impact of using FE-only models vs. FSI models, as well as an isotropic vs. an anisotropic leaflet material model in TAV simulations. From the results, substantial differences in leaflet kinematics between FE-only and FSI models were observed, and the FSI model could capture the realistic leaflet dynamic deformation due to its more accurate spatial and temporal loading conditions imposed on the leaflets. The stress and the strain distributions were similar between the FE and FSI simulations. However, the peak stresses were different due to the water hammer effect induced by the fluid inertia in the FSI model during the closing phase, which led to 13–28% lower peak stresses in the FE-only model compared to that of the FSI model. The simulation results also indicated that tissue anisotropy had a minor impact on hemodynamics of the valve. However, a lower tissue stiffness in the radial direction of the leaflets could reduce the leaflet peak stress caused by the water hammer effect. It is hoped that the developed FSI models can serve as an effective tool to better assess valve dynamics and optimize next generation TAV designs.

[1]  S Shahriari,et al.  Evaluation of shear stress accumulation on blood components in normal and dysfunctional bileaflet mechanical heart valves using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Jia Lu,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves Using a Stress Resultant Shell Model , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R. Ogden.  Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[5]  Govinda Balan Kalyana Sundaram,et al.  Aortic valve dynamics using a fluid structure interaction model--The physiology of opening and closing. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D. J. Benson,et al.  Patient-specific isogeometric structural analysis of aortic valve closure , 2015 .

[7]  Charles H. Bloodworth,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction and structural analyses using a comprehensive mitral valve model with 3D chordal structure , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[8]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Effects of valve geometry and tissue anisotropy on the radial stretch and coaptation area of tissue-engineered heart valves. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  A Novel Approach to the In Vitro Hydrodynamic Study of the Aortic Valve: Mock Loop Development and Test , 2010, ASAIO journal.

[10]  Hirofumi Tanaka,et al.  Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  A. Saleeb,et al.  The important roles of tissue anisotropy and tissue-to-tissue contact on the dynamical behavior of a symmetric tri-leaflet valve during multiple cardiac pressure cycles. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[13]  J. Monaghan.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[14]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[15]  Alain Cribier,et al.  Acute Improvement in Global and Regional Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Percutaneous Heart Valve Implantation in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  Ajit P Yoganathan,et al.  Fluid mechanics of heart valves. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  A. Cribier,et al.  Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2015, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[19]  Xu Huang,et al.  Fluid Structure Interaction Study of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve with FESPH Method , 2013 .

[20]  B. Reddy,et al.  Aortic valve leaflet mechanical properties facilitate diastolic valve function , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  M. Schlamann,et al.  In-vitro investigation of the hemodynamics of the Edwards Sapien transcatheter heart valve. , 2011, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[22]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Hemodynamic and thrombogenic analysis of a trileaflet polymeric valve using a fluid-structure interaction approach. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Kewei Li,et al.  Simulated Thin Pericardial Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflet Deformation Under Static Pressure-Only Loading Conditions: Implications for Percutaneous Valves , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  E. Chaikof,et al.  Numerical approximation of tangent moduli for finite element implementations of nonlinear hyperelastic material models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Claudio Chiastra,et al.  Fluid–Structure Interaction Model of a Percutaneous Aortic Valve: Comparison with an In Vitro Test and Feasibility Study in a Patient-Specific Case , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Gil Marom,et al.  Numerical Methods for Fluid–Structure Interaction Models of Aortic Valves , 2014, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[27]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Adrian Ranga,et al.  Computational simulations of the aortic valve validated by imaging data: evaluation of valve-sparing techniques. , 2006, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[29]  I. Borazjani.  Fluid–structure interaction, immersed boundary-finite element method simulations of bio-prosthetic heart valves , 2013 .

[30]  Wei Sun,et al.  Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation: implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Wei Sun,et al.  Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues , 2005, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  Matteo Astorino,et al.  Computational analysis of an aortic valve jet with Lagrangian coherent structures. , 2010, Chaos.

[33]  Cornie Scheffer,et al.  In vitro characterization of an aortic bioprosthetic valve using Doppler echocardiography and qualitative flow visualization , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Charles H. Bloodworth,et al.  High-resolution subject-specific mitral valve imaging and modeling: experimental and computational methods , 2016, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[35]  R. Ogden,et al.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Vittoria Flamini,et al.  Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic root , 2015, Theoretical and computational fluid dynamics.

[37]  B. Rogers,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method applied to pulsatile flow inside a rigid two‐dimensional model of left heart cavity , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[38]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[39]  H H Sievers,et al.  Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[40]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The electronic structure and magnetism of the Al/Fe interfaces , 2000 .

[41]  Matteo Astorino,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction and multi-body contact. Application to aortic valves , 2009 .

[42]  Emiliano Votta,et al.  Impact of modeling fluid-structure interaction in the computational analysis of aortic root biomechanics. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  M. Mack,et al.  Uncertainty and Possible Subclinical Valve Leaflet Thrombosis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Gil Marom,et al.  A fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[45]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method , 2003 .

[46]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models , 2015, Computational mechanics.

[47]  C. Peskin.  Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[48]  W. Wan,et al.  Design and simulation of a poly(vinyl alcohol)—bacterial cellulose nanocomposite mechanical aortic heart valve prosthesis , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.