Dynamical components analysis of fMRI data through kernel PCA

In parallel with standard model-based methods for the analysis of fMRI data, exploratory methods--such as PCA, ICA, and clustering--have been developed to give an account of the dataset with minimal priors: no assumption is made on the data content itself, but the data structure is assumed to show some properties (decorrelation, independence) that allow for the detection of structures of interest. In this paper, we present an alternative that tries to take into account some relevant knowledge for the analysis of the dataset, e.g., the experimental paradigm, while keeping the flexibility of exploratory methods: we use a prior temporal modeling of the data that characterizes each voxel time course. Two implementations are proposed: one based on the General Linear Model, the other one on more flexible short-term predictors, whose complexity is controlled by a Minimum Description Length approach. However, our main concern here is the construction of a multivariate model; the latter is performed with the help of a kernel PCA method that builds a redundant representation of the data through the nonlinearity of the kernel. This allows for a refinement in the description of the (temporal) patterns of interest. In particular, this helps in the characterization of subtle variations in the response to different experimental conditions. We illustrate the usefulness of nonlinearity through the analysis of a synthetic dataset and show on a real dataset how it helps to interpret the experimental results.

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: The NPAIRS Data Analysis Framework , 2000, NeuroImage.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A general statistical analysis for fMRI data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing the Response of PET and fMRI Data Using Multivariate Linear Models , 1997, NeuroImage.

[5]  Markus Svensén,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of single-trial fMRI data , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Single-Trial Variability in Event-Related BOLD Signals , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Multivariate Model Specification for fMRI Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  A spatially robust ICA algorithm for multiple fMRI data sets , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Revealing interactions among brain systems with nonlinear PCA , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  S. Ruan,et al.  A multistep Unsupervised Fuzzy Clustering Analysis of fMRI time series , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Exploratory fMRI Analysis by Autocorrelation Maximization , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[13]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Ray L. Somorjai,et al.  Exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis (EROICA) using a spectral peak statistic for selecting and testing the significance of fMRI activation time-series , 2002, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear PCA: characterizing interactions between modes of brain activity. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[17]  Marc G. Genton,et al.  Classes of Kernels for Machine Learning: A Statistics Perspective , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  M. McKeown Detection of Consistently Task-Related Activations in fMRI Data with Hybrid Independent Component Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[21]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Generalizable Patterns in Neuroimaging: How Many Principal Components? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[22]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Dynamical components analysis of fMRI data , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[24]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Adaptive Entropy Rates for f MRI Time-Series Analysis , 2001, MICCAI.

[25]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Flows of diffeomorphisms for multimodal image registration , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[27]  C. Windischberger,et al.  Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Parcellation of brain images with anatomical and functional constraints for fMRI data analysis , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[29]  Perry D. Moerland,et al.  An On-Line EM Algorithm Applied to Kernel PCA , 2000 .

[30]  A. Andersen,et al.  Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: a generalized linear systems framework. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.