Computerized segmentation algorithm with personalized atlases of murine MRIs in a SV40 large T-antigen mouse mammary cancer model

Quantities of MRI data, much larger than can be objectively and efficiently analyzed manually, are routinely generated in preclinical research. We aim to develop an automated image segmentation and registration pipeline to aid in analysis of image data from our high-throughput 9.4 Tesla small animal MRI imaging center. T2-weighted, fat-suppressed MRIs were acquired over 4 life-cycle time-points [up to 12 to 18 weeks] of twelve C3(1) SV40 Large T-antigen mice for a total of 46 T2-weighted MRI volumes; each with a matrix size of 192 x 256, 62 slices, in plane resolution 0.1 mm, and slice thickness 0.5 mm. These image sets were acquired with the goal of tracking and quantifying progression of mammary intraepithelial neoplasia (MIN) to invasive cancer in mice, believed to be similar to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in humans. Our segmentation algorithm takes 2D seed-points drawn by the user at the center of the 4 co-registered volumes associated with each mouse. The level set then evolves in 3D from these 2D seeds. The contour evolution incorporates texture information, edge information, and a statistical shape model in a two-step process. Volumetric DICE coefficients comparing the automatic with manual segmentations were computed and ranged between 0.75 and 0.58 for averages over the 4 life-cycle time points of the mice. Incorporation of these personalized atlases with intra and inter mouse registration is expected to enable locally and globally tracking of the morphological and textural changes in the mammary tissue and associated lesions of these mice.

[1]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  T(2)∗ relaxation times of intraductal murine mammary cancer, invasive mammary cancer, and normal mammary gland. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  Xavier Bresson,et al.  A Variational Model for Object Segmentation Using Boundary Information and Shape Prior Driven by the Mumford-Shah Functional , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Cheryl Jorcyk,et al.  The C3(1)/SV40 T-antigen transgenic mouse model of mammary cancer: ductal epithelial cell targeting with multistage progression to carcinoma , 2000, Oncogene.

[4]  Erica Markiewicz,et al.  High resolution 3D MRI of mouse mammary glands with intra-ductal injection of contrast media. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  José Luis Villaseñor,et al.  Estimating the effect of the similarity coeffi cient and the cluster algorithm on biogeographic classifi cations , 2003 .

[7]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[8]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Suzanne D. Conzen,et al.  In vivo MRI of early stage mammary cancers and the normal mouse mammary gland , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  A 3D interactive multi-object segmentation tool using local robust statistics driven active contours , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  A statistically based flow for image segmentation , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Stefan Vogt,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. , 2009, Radiology.