The 125th attempt to develop a monoclonal antibody against ovarian cancer in a laboratory at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) led to the discovery of one of the most widely used tumor markers, CA-125. Over the past two decades, the value of CA-125 has been tested in monitoring response to treatment, detecting recurrent disease, and screening for early-stage ovarian cancer. CA-125 has proven useful in determining prognosis and response to treatment for women undergoing chemotherapy. Persistent elevation of CA-125 has detected residual disease after primary treatment with high specificity. A rise in serum CA-125 levels often precedes clinical symptoms or imaging detection of recurrent disease by 3 to 6 months. While the use of a “good marker” to track a “bad disease” in these settings has been questioned, information provided by CA-125 provides additional time for patients to receive and to benefit from the many currently active drugs. As treatment of persistent and recurrent disease becomes more effective in the era of targeted therapy, CA-125 and other biomarkers should become of even greater value in patient management. While a single value of CA-125 lacks the specificity and sensitivity required for early detection, greater specificity has been attained by measuring CA-125 over time and by combining CA125 with ultrasonography. Statistical analysis, such as the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA model) developed by Skates et al, can examine changes in CA-125 levels over time. The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial on Ovarian Cancer Screening has completed accrual of 200,000 women, testing the value of a rising CA-125 to trigger transvaginal sonography in postmenopausal women at average risk for ovarian cancer. If this trial succeeds, there is clearly room for improvement, as 20% of ovarian cancers fail to express significant amounts of CA-125. A greater fraction of patients with early-stage disease might be detected with a panel of biomarkers that complement or replace CA-125. CA-125 has also been tested for the ability to distinguish malignant from benign pelvic masses. The ability to predict whether a tumor is malignant or benign before surgery is important. Approximately 20% of women will develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass in their lifetime and many of these women will undergo unnecessary surgery. Conversely, if surgery is indicated, the location in which the surgery is performed is critical. Despite modest gains in the fraction of women cured, optimal management of malignant ovarian cancers has significantly improved survival over the past 30 years. With the development and application of cytoreductive surgery, primary platinum-taxane chemotherapy and active second-line agents, the 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer patients has improved from 20% to 50%. Several different reports have shown that patients treated by gynecologic oncologists will more often undergo full surgical staging or an optimal cytoreductive operation. More recently, multiple studies have shown ovarian cancer patients treated in tertiary care centers with multidisciplinary teams specializing in the management of ovarian cancer have fewer complications and longer survival rates. The triage of women to centers of excellence in the management of ovarian malignancy is critical for optimal treatment. Tests that permit the identification of women at high risk for the presence of a malignancy will be instrumental for the triage of patients to appropriate centers. Despite a number of trials examining CA-125, with or without the use of sonography, in women with a pelvic mass, it has become increasingly clear that no one modality will be sufficient to predict accurately the presence of an ovarian malignancy. Many different tumor markers have been analyzed, but none has achieved the sensitivity or specificity to be clinically useful as an individual test. Recently, the addition of HE-4 to CA-125, without the use of ultrasound, has increased the sensitivity of CA-125 by 22% at a specificity of 90%. Jacobs et al have used the combination of ultrasound, CA-125, and menopausal status to create a risk of malignancy index (RMI), achieving a sensitivity of 85% with a specificity of 97% for predicting the presence of ovarian cancers in women with pelvic masses. The contribution of CA-125 to the RMI was critical for assigning masses to the malignant category, whereas sonography was particularly important in identifying benign disease. One of the advantages of the RMI is its simplicity, making it appropriate for everyday clinical use. DePriest et al developed a morphology index utilizing the architectural features of ovarian neoplasms on pelvic ultrasound to predict a probability of malignancy without the use of CA-125. The morphology index achieved a positive predictive value of up to 0.45. Although JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY E D I T O R I A L VOLUME 25 NUMBER 27 SEPTEMBER 2
[1]
Sabine Van Huffel,et al.
Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors.
,
2007,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2]
A. Whittemore,et al.
Patterns and Progress in Ovarian Cancer Over 14 Years
,
2006,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[3]
A. Gadducci,et al.
Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature
,
2006,
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[4]
R. Bast,et al.
A novel multiple biomarker assay for the detection of ovarian carcinoma.
,
2006,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5]
Deborah Schrag,et al.
Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients.
,
2006,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[6]
S. Tretli,et al.
Improved short‐term survival for advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients operated at teaching hospitals
,
2006,
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.
[7]
E. D. de Vries,et al.
Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma
,
2006,
Cancer.
[8]
T. Bourne,et al.
Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.
,
2005,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[9]
B. Rosen,et al.
Who should operate on patients with ovarian cancer? An evidence-based review.
,
2005,
Gynecologic oncology.
[10]
Usha Menon,et al.
Progress and Challenges in Screening for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer*
,
2004,
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[11]
H. Howe,et al.
Descriptive epidemiology of ovarian cancer in the United States, 1992–1997
,
2003,
Cancer.
[12]
Steven J Skates,et al.
Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women.
,
2003,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[13]
Alexander Tsodikov,et al.
A population-based study of patterns of care for ovarian cancer: who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is not?
,
2002,
Gynecologic oncology.
[14]
G. Mills,et al.
Early detection of ovarian cancer: promise and reality.
,
2002,
Cancer treatment and research.
[15]
J. Murdoch,et al.
The surgical management of women with ovarian cancer in the south west of England
,
2001,
British Journal of Cancer.
[16]
H. Nishimura,et al.
Comparison of CA 125 assays with abdominopelvic computed tomography and transvaginal ultrasound in monitoring of ovarian cancer
,
1996,
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[17]
H E Lambert,et al.
Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125.
,
1996,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[18]
E J Pavlik,et al.
A morphology index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer.
,
1993,
Gynecologic oncology.
[19]
J. Grudzinskas,et al.
Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography.
,
1993,
BMJ.
[20]
I. Jacobs,et al.
A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer
,
1990
.
[21]
R. Hawkins,et al.
The prognostic significance of the half‐life of serum CA 125 in patients responding to chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma
,
1989
.
[22]
H. Norris,et al.
Misstaging of Ovarian Cancer
,
1985,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[23]
R. Bast,et al.
A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer.
,
1983,
The New England journal of medicine.
[24]
R. Bast,et al.
Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma.
,
1981,
The Journal of clinical investigation.