Natural Images: Coding Efficiency

A wide variety of studies over the past 20 years have demonstrated that our sensory systems are remarkably efficient at coding the sensory environment. Much of this work has focused on the visual system and has demonstrated that many properties of the early visual system are extremely well matched to the statistical structure of the visual world. However, there remain many questions regarding how far this approach can be taken in understanding the full visual system, especially higher levels of visual processing. Basic theories of efficiency (e.g., decorrelation, sparseness, independence) are likely to be insufficient in accounting for the more complex nonlinear representations found in higher levels. In this article, we take a closer look at how efficiency might be defined. In particular, we consider three forms of efficiency: representational efficiency, metabolic efficiency, and learning efficiency. Although the majority of studies have focused on representational efficiency and metabolic efficiency, we argue that a complete account of visual processing must consider all three forms.

[1]  David J. Field,et al.  How Close Are We to Understanding V1? , 2005, Neural Computation.

[2]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  L. Maloney,et al.  Color constancy: a method for recovering surface spectral reflectance. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[6]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[7]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[8]  R. Segev,et al.  How silent is the brain: is there a “dark matter” problem in neuroscience? , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  The metabolic cost of neural information , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Mitchison Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  S. Pallas,et al.  Visual experience is necessary for maintenance but not development of receptive fields in superior colliculus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D. Field,et al.  Estimates of the information content and dimensionality of natural scenes from proximity distributions. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Daniel J. Graham,et al.  Can the theory of “whitening” explain the center-surround properties of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields? , 2006, Vision Research.

[18]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[19]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Firing Rate Distributions and Efficiency of Information Transmission of Inferior Temporal Cortex Neurons to Natural Visual Stimuli , 1999, Neural Computation.

[21]  B. Finlay,et al.  Comparative Aspects of Visual System Development , 2006 .

[22]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[23]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Maps in the brain: what can we learn from them? , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.