Customer-driven supply chains under IMP lens

Purpose This paper explores the most recent contributions to interpreting customer-driven supply chains (CDSCs) under the IMP lens, focusing on the main characteristics that emerged from a review of the relevant literature. The purpose of this paper is to offer a holistic interpretative framework of major topics covered by the CDSC literature, highlighting both some shared issues and emerging elements using the IMP conceptual framework’s ARA (actor bonds, activity links and resource ties) model. Design/methodology/approach The paper reviewed the literature by searching selected journals using a combination of specific keywords in order to find the most recent contributions on the CDSC theme. The presented analysis allowed an interpretation of the findings through a conceptual framework. Findings The findings suggest that the ARA model could be a useful method through which to structure an interpretation of the most recent contributions, in both IMP and the general literature, on the discipline. In particular, three streams of research were identified: the customer closeness strategy, relational strategy, and intra-organizational strategy. Research limitations/implications These clusters can be deeply analyzed using the major knowledge on CDSC dynamics. By studying these issues in an integrated way, the implications in terms of competition, generalization of results, constraints, problems, and difficulties of the customer-driven approach could be enhanced. Limitations are the restricted period of time and the absence of empirical research. Practical implications Each identified cluster presents the tools that have to be improved in order to implement the customer-driven orientation, which increases the performance and brings an added value for the same supply chain. For this reason, an emerging need is to develop studies on the empirical side that consider the implications in terms of an integrated framework among the three issues. Originality/value The paper increases the understanding of CDSCs by using conceptual and interpretative tools developed by the IMP literature. The ARA model allows the creation of a conceptual framework that clarifies, in a holistic way, the most important characteristics that have to be developed in order to improve the CDSC perspective. Recommendations and a research agenda for the implementation of the customer-driven view are derived.

[1]  J. Santos,et al.  Reinventing the wheel? A critical view of demand-chain management , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffrey H. Dyer Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[3]  M. Christopher,et al.  Demand chain alignment competence — delivering value through product life cycle management , 2006 .

[4]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Analysing Business Interaction , 2008 .

[5]  Hans C.M. van Trijp,et al.  The emergent demand chain management: key features and illustration from the beef business , 2008 .

[6]  Michael Tracey,et al.  The impact of supply‐chain management capabilities on business performance , 2005 .

[7]  Annalisa Tunisini,et al.  Mid-sized manufacturing companies: The new driver of Italian competitiveness , 2013 .

[8]  R. Lamming,et al.  Supply management: is it a discipline? , 2006 .

[9]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply Network Strategies , 2001 .

[10]  Annalisa Tunisini,et al.  Organizing and integrating marketing and purchasing in business markets: An introduction to the special issue, issues and implications , 2009 .

[11]  Herbert Kotzab,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND PRIORITY STRATEGIES IN DANISH ORGANIZATIONS , 2006 .

[12]  James H. Martin,et al.  Using supply chain management to leverage a firm's market orientation , 2003 .

[13]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Outcome-driven supply chains , 2010 .

[14]  Simone Guercini,et al.  The integration between marketing and purchasing in the traceability process , 2009 .

[15]  Michael S. Garver Best practices in identifying customer-driven improvement opportunities , 2003 .

[16]  D. Ford,et al.  How should companies interact in business networks , 2002 .

[17]  J. Mentzer,et al.  A market orientation in supply chain management , 2007 .

[18]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[19]  W. Selen,et al.  Operations in today’s demand chain management framework , 2002 .

[20]  B. Çatay,et al.  Competition through collaboration: insights from an initiative in the Turkish textile supply chain , 2005 .

[21]  Nigel F. Piercy,et al.  Strategic relationships between boundary-spanning functions: Aligning customer relationship management with supplier relationship management , 2009 .

[22]  S. Guercini,et al.  A strategic supply chain approach: consortium marketing in the Italian leatherwear industry , 2012 .

[23]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Managing Interfaces with Suppliers , 1999 .

[24]  Roberta Sebastiani,et al.  Innovative and networked business functions: customer-driven procurement , 2015 .

[25]  M. Christopher Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service (Second Edition) , 1999 .

[26]  Daniel F. Lynch,et al.  Public Policy and Global Supply Chain Capabilities and Performance: A Resource-Based View , 2002 .

[27]  Arun Sharma,et al.  Why integrating purchasing with marketing is both inevitable and beneficial , 2009 .

[28]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[29]  S. Min,et al.  International supply chain management in an Internet environment , 2001 .

[30]  Who is the customer? : On the nature of customer representation in supply chains , 2011 .

[31]  C. Voss,et al.  The impact of supply chain relationship dynamics on manufacturing performance , 2005 .

[32]  Johny K. Johansson,et al.  Customer‐oriented cost cutting : process management at Volvo , 2001 .

[33]  Arjan J. van Weele,et al.  Market orientation and innovativeness in supply chains: Supplier's impact on customer satisfaction , 2013 .

[34]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[35]  Nigel Caldwell,et al.  Transparency in Supply Relationships: Concept and Practice , 2001 .

[36]  Indah Victoria Sandroto,et al.  Supply chain coordination in a fashion firm , 2004 .

[37]  D. Flint,et al.  Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: An international study , 2008 .

[38]  Jared M. Hansen,et al.  The evolution of buyer‐supplier relationships: an historical industry approach , 2009 .

[39]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[40]  C. Perry,et al.  A customer‐oriented new service development process , 2002 .

[41]  Kamel A. Fantazy,et al.  An empirical study of the relationships among strategy, flexibility, and performance in the supply chain context , 2009 .

[42]  J. Gattorna,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN COST MANAGEMENT AND VALUE-BASED PRICING , 2005 .

[43]  A. Tunisini,et al.  Reconfiguring Supplier Relationships between Local and Global: History Matters , 2009 .

[44]  H. Håkansson,et al.  No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy , 1989 .

[45]  David M. Gligor,et al.  A Cross‐Disciplinary Examination of Firm Orientations’ Performance Outcomes: The Role of Supply Chain Flexibility , 2014 .

[46]  George D. Deitz,et al.  Linking supply chain management with mass customization capability , 2011 .

[47]  C. Harland Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks , 1996 .