Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review

Approximately 3000 papers concerning multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in the environmental field were identified through a series of queries in the Web of Science database and classified by MCDA method and environmental application using text mining in R. Stemming and stop word removal techniques were used to remove irrelevant text from the literature. Trends in MCDA methods (AHP/ANP, TOPSIS, outranking, MAUT/MAVT) associated with specific environmental applications (water, air, energy, natural resources, and waste management) or interventions/tools applications (stakeholders, strategies, sustainability, and GIS) were identified. The results show a linear growth in the share of MCDA papers in environmental science across all application areas. Furthermore, the results show that AHP/ANP and MAUT/MAVT are the most frequently mentioned MCDA methods in the literature. For environmental applications, the results showed that natural resource and waste management keywords were, respectively, the most and least commonly discussed applications within the MCDA papers. For intervention/tool applications, we found that keywords associated with ‘strategy’ and ‘GIS’ applications are, respectively, the most and least commonly discussed keywords within the MCDA papers. The authors found that MCDA method keywords were evenly distributed across the environmental and intervention/tool applications, indicating a lack of preference in the environmental field for use of specific MCDA methods. This paper demonstrates that text mining is an applicable tool to assess specific textual trends and patterns when analyzing larger bodies of MCDA literature.

[1]  Ronen Feldman,et al.  Book Reviews: The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches to Analyzing Unstructured Data by Ronen Feldman and James Sanger , 2008, CL.

[2]  B. Roy,et al.  The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works , 1996 .

[3]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies , 2011 .

[4]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  Ronen Feldman,et al.  The Text Mining Handbook: Index , 2006 .

[6]  Marco Cinelli,et al.  Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[7]  R. Ramya,et al.  Effective Pre-Processing Activities in Text Mining using Improved Porter's Stemming Algorithm , 2013 .

[8]  Philip English,et al.  Multicriteria Analysis for Capital Budgeting , 2013 .

[9]  Peter Jackson,et al.  5.1 What is text mining , 2007 .

[10]  A. Mühlbacher,et al.  Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA , 2016, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

[11]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Ted Kwartler.  What is Text Mining , 2017 .

[13]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[14]  Avraam Karagiannidis,et al.  The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review , 2013, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[15]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.