Evaluating the process of triple bottom line reporting: Increasing the potential for change1

Abstract This paper presents an evaluation framework that aims to improve the outcomes of triple bottom line (TBL) reporting. Currently, most assessments of TBL reporting focus on report content. Our view is that effective evaluation of TBL reporting should go beyond reports as the outputs of a process and focus on what is being learned through the process, the capacity- and relationship-building that might eventuate, and how this impacts on the development of sustainability. To enable more effective reflection of TBL reporting processes, we developed a set of evaluation criteria focused on the process of reporting. These criteria were identified from case studies of social, environmental and/or sustainability reporting processes documented in the literature. A large number of potential criteria were synthesised into three desired outcomes of TBL reporting and 10 prompts for discussion and reflection during evaluation. This evaluation framework should assist those dedicated to challenging assumptions that inhibit progress towards a sustainable future for society.

[1]  Carlos Larrinaga,et al.  Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting , 2001 .

[2]  K. Eckerberg,et al.  The Use of Local Sustainability Indicators: case studies in two Swedish municipalities1 , 2003 .

[3]  Tavis Potts,et al.  Triple bottom line reporting : a tool for measuring, communicating and facilitating change in local communities , 2004 .

[4]  S. Ogden,et al.  Customer disclosures, impression management and the construction of legitimacy: Corporate reports in the UK privatised water industry , 2005 .

[5]  Simon Zadek,et al.  The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .

[6]  M. Milne,et al.  From sustainable management to sustainable development: a longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter , 2006 .

[7]  A. Ball.  Environmental accounting and change in UK local government , 2005 .

[8]  M. Milne,et al.  Creating Adventures in Wonderland: The Journey Metaphor and Environmental Sustainability , 2006 .

[9]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[10]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[11]  Carmen Correa-ruiz,et al.  The Role of Environmental Accounting in Organizational Change: An Exploration of Spanish Companies , 2001 .

[12]  S. Livesey,et al.  Transparent and Caring Corporations? , 2002 .

[13]  Roderic A. Gill,et al.  Planning for sustainability as a learning concept , 1998 .

[14]  Brendan O'Dwyer,et al.  The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency , 2005 .

[15]  Frank Vanclay.  Experience from the Field of Social Impact Assessment: Where do TBL, EIA and SIA Fit in Relation to Each Other? , 2003 .

[16]  Tavis Potts,et al.  A framework for the analysis of sustainability indicator systems in fisheries , 2006 .

[17]  William Scott,et al.  Sustainable Development and Learning: framing the issues , 2003 .

[18]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Is Capitalism Sustainable?: Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology , 1994 .

[19]  Hussein A. Warsame,et al.  Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports , 1998 .

[20]  K. Lee.  So what is the 'Triple Bottom Line'? , 2007 .

[21]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our Common Future (‘The Brundtland Report’): World Commission on Environment and Development , 2009 .

[22]  M. Rogers.  Social sustainability and the art of engagement—the small towns: big picture experience , 2005 .

[23]  M. Milne.  Playing with magic lanterns: the New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development and corporate triple bottom line reporting , 2005 .

[24]  A. Sobczak,et al.  Beyond CSR: organisational learning for global responsibility , 2004 .

[25]  A. Ball.  Environmental accounting as workplace activism , 2007 .

[26]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap , 2004 .

[27]  Vesela Veleva,et al.  Indicators for measuring environmental sustainability , 2003 .

[28]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  Making a difference : sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. , 2007 .

[29]  R. Gray,et al.  Sustainability Reporting: Who's Kidding Whom? , 2002 .

[30]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: a case study relating to a ‘Blue Plan’ project in Malta , 2004 .

[31]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[32]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework , 2006 .

[33]  C. Deegan,et al.  An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[34]  Adrian Henriques,et al.  The triple bottom line, does it all add up? : assessing the sustainability of business and CSR , 2004 .

[35]  I. Thomson,et al.  Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation , 2005 .

[36]  Vesela Veleva,et al.  Do Indicators Help Create Sustainable Communities? , 2003 .

[37]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[38]  David Schweickart,et al.  Is Sustainable Capitalism Possible , 2010 .