Optimizing feature extraction in image analysis using experimented designs: a case study evaluating texture algorithms for describing appearance retention in carpets

When performing image analysis, one of the most critical steps is the selection of appropriate techniques. A huge amount of features can be extracted from several techniques and the selection is commonly performed based on expert knowledge. In this paper we present the theory of experimental designs as a tool for an objective selection of techniques in image analysis domain. We present a study case for evaluating appearance retention in textile floor coverings using texture features. The use of experimental design theory permitted to select an optimal set of techniques for describing the texture changes due to degradation.

[1]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[2]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[4]  Marko Heikkilä,et al.  A Texture-based Method for Detecting Moving Objects , 2004, BMVC.

[5]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Image processing - dealing with texture , 2020 .

[6]  R. de Keyser,et al.  Feature extraction of the wear label of carpets by using a novel 3D scanner , 2010, Photonics Europe.

[7]  Andreas Ernst,et al.  Face detection with the modified census transform , 2004, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings..

[8]  Benhur Ortiz Jaramillo,et al.  Improving textures discrimination in the local binary patterns technique by using symmetry & group theory , 2011, 2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[9]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in radiology from 1997 to 2006. , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  R. Zucker,et al.  Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images. , 2001, Cytometry.

[11]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  Comparison of edge detectors: a methodology and initial study , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Statistical evaluation of image quality measures , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Ewout Vansteenkiste,et al.  Evaluation of the wear label description in carpets by using local binary pattern techniques , 2010 .

[15]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[16]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Sameer Singh,et al.  An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  Jacques Blanc-Talon,et al.  Imaging and vision systems: theory, assessment and applications , 2001 .

[19]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  Comparison of Edge Detectors: A Methodology and Initial Study , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..