Automatic arm removal in PET and CT images for deformable registration

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is rapidly expanding its role in clinical practice for cancer management. The high sensitivity of PET for functional abnormalities associated with cancer can be confounded by the minimal anatomical information it provides for cancer localization. Computed tomography (CT) provides detailed anatomical information but is less sensitive to pathologies than PET. Thus, combining (i.e., registering) PET and CT images would enable both accurate and sensitive cancer localization with respect to detailed patient anatomy. An additional application area of registration is to align CT-CT scans from serial studies on a patient on a PET/CT scanner to facilitate accurate assessment of therapeutic response from the co-aligned PET images. To facilitate image fusion, we are developing a deformable registration software system using mutual information and a B-spline model of the deformation. When applying deformable registration to whole body images, one of the obstacles is that the arms are present in PET images but not in CT images or are in different positions in serial CT images. This feature mismatch requires a preprocessing step to remove the arms where present and thus adds a manual step in an otherwise automatic algorithm. In this paper, we present a simple yet effective method for automatic arm removal. We demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of this algorithm on both clinical PET and CT images. By streamlining the entire registration process, we expect that the fusion technology will soon find its way into clinics, greatly benefiting cancer diagnosis, staging, therapy planning and treatment monitoring.

[1]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  James C. Gee,et al.  Registration patterns: the generic framework for image registration of the insight toolkit , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[3]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Jan Modersitzki,et al.  Numerical Methods for Image Registration , 2004 .

[5]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations. I. Methodology and validation on normal subjects , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1991 .

[8]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Michael J. Ackerman,et al.  Open source software for medical image processing and visualization , 2005, CACM.

[10]  Lydia Ng,et al.  Advanced PET/CT fusion workstation for oncology imaging , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Utilization of 3-D elastic transformation in the registration of chest X-ray CT and whole body PET , 1996 .

[12]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  PET/CT scanner instrumentation, challenges, and solutions. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .