Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency among Coffee Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire: Evidence from the Centre West Region

This paper presents measures of technical efficiency for a sample of 81 peasant farmers in the low-income region of Cote d’Ivoire. DEA techniques were used to compute farm-level technical efficiency (TE) measures. The analysis reveals average levels of technical efficiency equal to 36 per cent and 47 per cent respectively for the CCR (Charnes et al., 1978) and BCC (Banker et al., 1984) models. These results suggest that substantial gains in output and/or decreases in cost can be attained given existing technology. In a second step analysis, two-limit Tobit regression techniques were used to examine the relationship between TE and various farm/farmer characteristics. From a policy point of view, an important conclusion stemming from the analysis of our sample is that family size, membership to farmer's club or association and the origin of the farmer are the variables found to be most promising for action. The analysis suggests that policymakers should foster the development of the formal farmers’ club or association by building the capacity of the farmers. Our analysis also supports the argument for public sector involvement in the provision of information on labour force management to peasant farmers as a means to improve efficiency levels, and thus household incomes.

[1]  B. Bravo‐Ureta,et al.  TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC, AND ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY IN PEASANT FARMING: EVIDENCE FROM THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC , 1997 .

[2]  Euan Fleming,et al.  Technical efficiency and productivity of maize producers in eastern Ethiopia: a study of farmers within and outside the Sasakawa-Global 2000 project , 1998 .

[3]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[4]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  B. Bravo‐Ureta,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Developing Country Agriculture: A Review of the Frontier Function Literature , 1993, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[6]  Nick Vink,et al.  Farm size, productivity and returns to scale in agriculture revisited: a case study of wine producers in South Africa , 1998 .

[7]  Jürgen Müller,et al.  Sources of Technical Efficiency: The Roles of Modernization and Information , 1977, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[8]  R. Evenson,et al.  Efficiency in agricultural production: The case of peasant farmers in eastern Paraguay , 1994 .

[9]  T. Coelli RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FRONTIER MODELLING AND EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT , 1995 .

[10]  Kaliappa Kalirajan,et al.  The importance of efficient use in the adoption of technology: A micro panel data analysis , 1991 .

[11]  G. Battese Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics , 1992 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[13]  D. Squires,et al.  TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND FUTURE PRODUCTION GAINS IN INDONESIAN AGRICULTURE , 1991 .

[14]  Kaliappa Kalirajan,et al.  Types of education and agricultural productivity: A quantitative analysis of Tamil Nadu rice farming , 1985 .

[15]  M. T. Mochebelele,et al.  Migrant Labor and Farm Technical Efficiency in Lesotho , 2000 .

[16]  J. Scott Shonkwiler,et al.  Alternative stochastic specifications of the frontier production function in the analysis of agricultural credit programs and technical efficiency , 1986 .

[17]  J. M. Phillips,et al.  Farmer education and efficiency: a frontier production function approach , 1986 .

[18]  K. Kalirajan Farm‐Specific Technical Efficiencies and Development Policies , 1984 .