Active learning assisted strategy of constructing hybrid models in repetitive operations of membrane filtration processes: Using case of mixture of bentonite clay and sodium alginate

Reliable prediction of the transmembrane pressure (TMP) in membrane filtration systems often encounters different challenges in practice, including process nonlinearity, cycle-to-cycle change, and multiple operating conditions. In this work, an active learning TMP model with the hybrid structure is developed to predict the short-term fouling formation. The advantages of the physical and empirical models are integrated into this hybrid model. For construction of the empirical model, the Gaussian process regression model (GPRM) is adopted to approximate the complex fouling mechanism with fouling propensity in the short-term period. It can be a useful complement to the physical model with inaccuracy. Moreover, GPRM can simultaneously provide the prediction variance. Using this appealing property, the hybrid TMP model can be updated in an active and efficient manner without introducing additional unnecessary data samples. Consequently, accurate hybrid TMP models for the repetitive operations of membrane filtration processes are established. The superiority of the proposed hybrid TMP models is demonstrated through simulation and short-term experiments. The experimental results show the hybrid TMP models have better prediction performance (with R2 values larger than 0.9) than the physical model (with R2 about 0.5).

[1]  J. Laîné,et al.  Neural networks for prediction of ultrafiltration transmembrane pressure – application to drinking water production , 1998 .

[2]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Nonlinear System Identification with Selective Recursive Gaussian Process Models , 2013 .

[3]  Soon Keat Tan,et al.  Moving-Window GPR for Nonlinear Dynamic System Modeling with Dual Updating and Dual Preprocessing , 2012 .

[4]  Ali Mortazavi,et al.  Dynamic modelling of milk ultrafiltration by artificial neural network , 2003 .

[5]  Qi-feng Liu,et al.  Prediction of microfiltration membrane fouling using artificial neural network models , 2009 .

[6]  Eric Latrille,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks for crossflow microfiltration modelling: “black-box” and semi-physical approaches , 1997 .

[7]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  A Review on Flux Decline Control Strategies in Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes , 2015 .

[8]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Modelling the long-term evolution of permeability in a full-scale MBR: Statistical approaches , 2013 .

[9]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  A chemometric approach to prediction of transmembrane pressure in membrane bioreactors , 2013 .

[10]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Modeling of pore blocking and cake layer formation in membrane filtration for wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[11]  Sebastião Feyo de Azevedo,et al.  Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Abdolhamid Salahi,et al.  Experimental investigation, modeling and optimization of membrane separation using artificial neural network and multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm , 2013 .

[13]  Biswajit Sarkar,et al.  Prediction of permeate flux during electric field enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration-A neural network approach , 2009 .

[14]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Membrane technology enhancement in oil–water separation. A review , 2015 .

[15]  Coskun Aydiner,et al.  Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: the case of phosphate removal , 2005 .

[16]  J. Busch,et al.  Model-based control of MF/UF filtration processes: pilot plant implementation and results. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Predicting effect of interparticle interactions on permeate flux decline in CMF of colloidal suspensions: An overlapped type of local neural network , 2008 .

[18]  Oluwaseun O. Ogunbiyi,et al.  Methods Employed for Control of Fouling in MF and UF Membranes: A Comprehensive Review , 2005 .

[19]  G. B. Sahoo,et al.  Predicting flux decline in crossflow membranes using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms , 2006 .

[20]  Shankararaman Chellam,et al.  Artificial neural network model for transient crossflow microfiltration of polydispersed suspensions , 2005 .

[21]  Christine Moresoli,et al.  Fluorescence‐based fouling prediction and optimization of a membrane filtration process for drinking water treatment , 2012 .

[22]  Yi Liu,et al.  Real-time property prediction for an industrial rubber-mixing process with probabilistic ensemble Gaussian process regression models , 2015 .

[23]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[24]  K. Funatsu,et al.  Adaptive model and model selection for long-term transmembrane pressure prediction in membrane bioreactors , 2015 .

[25]  Gordon Lightbody,et al.  Gaussian process approach for modelling of nonlinear systems , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  G. Civelekoglu,et al.  Effects of various backwash scenarios on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor , 2009 .

[27]  Majid Bagheri,et al.  Evaluation and prediction of membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor with simultaneous upward and downward aeration using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm , 2015 .

[28]  Chi-Man Vong,et al.  Local Receptive Fields Based Extreme Learning Machine , 2015, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[29]  Michel Cabassud,et al.  Dynamic modelling of crossflow microfiltration of bentonite suspension using recurrent neural networks , 1999 .

[30]  M. M. Montazer-Rahmati,et al.  A comparison between semi-theoretical and empirical modeling of cross-flow microfiltration using ANN , 2011 .

[31]  Arthur Jutan,et al.  Grey-box modelling and control of chemical processes , 2002 .

[32]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Prediction of the rate of crossflow membrane ultrafiltration of colloids: A neural network approach , 1998 .

[33]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  External analysis-based fuzzy PLS model for prediction and monitoring in MBR , 2012 .

[34]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Prediction of membrane fouling in the pilot-scale microfiltration system using genetic programming. , 2009 .

[35]  Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda,et al.  Automatic control systems for submerged membrane bioreactors: a state-of-the-art review. , 2012, Water research.

[36]  Sangho Lee,et al.  Development of a statistical and mathematical hybrid model to predict membrane fouling and performance. , 2009 .

[37]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Modeling submerged hollow-fiber membrane filtration for wastewater treatment , 2007 .

[38]  Abhay B. Bulsari,et al.  SIMULATION OF MEMBRANE SEPARATION BY NEURAL NETWORKS , 1995 .

[39]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Auto-Switch Gaussian Process Regression-Based Probabilistic Soft Sensors for Industrial Multigrade Processes with Transitions , 2015 .

[40]  R. Lovitt,et al.  Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency , 2007 .

[41]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[42]  A. Kim,et al.  Prediction of permeate flux decline in crossflow membrane filtration of colloidal suspension: a radial basis function neural network approach , 2006 .

[43]  Sayed Siavash Madaeni,et al.  Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes , 2001 .

[44]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Run‐to‐run control of membrane filtration processes , 2007 .

[45]  Thomas Melin,et al.  Modelling approaches for filtration processes with novel submerged capillary modules in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment , 2005 .

[46]  G. Trystram,et al.  Dynamic modeling of crossflow microfiltration using neural networks , 1995 .

[47]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Influence of activated sludge properties on flux behavior in osmosis membrane bioreactor (OMBR) , 2012 .