Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect

Dehaene, Bossini, and Giraux (1993) revealed that subjects responded to large numbers faster with the choice on the right than with the choice on the left, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers (SNARC effect). According to Dehaene et al. (1993), the SNARC effect depends on the quantitative representation of number, such as a left-to-right-oriented analog number line. The main goal of the present study was twofold: first, to investigate whether the vertical SNARC effect could be observed, and, second, to verify whether Dehaene et al.’s (1993) explanation of the SNARC effect is correct. Experiments 2A and 2B showed the vertical SNARC effect in a parity judgment task. Subjects responded to large numbers faster with the top choice than with the bottom choice, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers. However, Experiment 3 failed to show the SNARC effect in a number magnitude judgment task, suggesting that the quantitative representation could be dissociated from the spatial code that produces the SNARC effect.

[1]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Processing auditory information: interaction of two population stereotypes. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric stroop-like interference in number comparison: evidence for strong interhemispheric integration of semantic number information. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[4]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  R W Proctor,et al.  Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Event-related fMRI analysis of the cerebral circuit for number comparison. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[8]  James V. Hinrichs,et al.  Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. , 1981 .

[9]  M. Ashcraft.  Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[10]  A. Fanini.  Prelexical Spatial Representations , 1996 .

[11]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  Processing auditory information: interaction of two population stereotypes. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[13]  T. Zandt,et al.  Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[14]  W. Fias,et al.  Semantic Influences on Feature-Based Attention Due to Overlap of Neural Circuits , 2002, Cortex.

[15]  L E Krueger,et al.  Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[17]  Diatoms in the London Clay , 1880, Nature.

[18]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Images of numbers, or “when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue” , 1992, Cognition.

[20]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing , 1995 .

[21]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Integrated versus modular theories of number skills and acalculia , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[24]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks , 1996 .

[25]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  David F. Marks,et al.  Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory , 1972 .

[29]  L E Krueger,et al.  Why 2×2=5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[30]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: Evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[33]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[34]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[35]  S Dehaene,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[37]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[38]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[39]  M. Brysbaert.  Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. , 1995 .

[40]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing , 1976 .

[41]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[42]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.

[44]  R. Proctor,et al.  Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice? , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.