Intraspecific interference among foraging blue crabs Callinectes sapidus: interactive effects of predator density and prey patch distribution

The interactive effects of predator density and prey distribution on the foraging behavior of an important estuarine predator were studied, at a fine temporal scale, using ultrasonic telemetry. The movement and agonistic activity of individual blue crabs Callinectes sapidus were monitored in large field enclosures, in which the density of crabs and the distribution of patches of bivalve prey Macoma balthica were varied. Agonism-related injury in blue crabs is common and may be quite costly. On a scale of days, blue crabs have been shown in previous studies to disperse, sometimes into prey-impoverished areas, in response to conspecific interference. On the scale of minutes to hours addressed in the present study, the density of predators and the distribution of their prey interacted to affect the foraging behavior and success of blue crabs. When only a single clam patch was available, blue crabs at high density interfered with each other's foraging by direct agonistic encounters, shown by an inverse correlation between agonistic activity and foraging success. Conversely, when prey were partitioned into 2 patches, blue crabs at high density apparently dispersed among the patches, thus minimizing direct agonistic clashes. Although crabs reduced the occurrence of agonistic encounters further than the 50 % attributable to their effectively halving their densities on each patch, they did not take refuge in the prey-impoverished areas between experimental patches for significant periods. Instead, they seemed to respond instantaneously to changing degree of risk by moving off the clam patch when another conspecific approached.

[1]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[2]  F. Micheli.  EFFECTS OF PREDATOR FORAGING BEHAVIOR ON PATTERNS OF PREY MORTALITY IN MARINE SOFT BOTTOMS , 1997 .

[3]  Interspecific Fighting in Three Species of Brachyuran Crabs From Hawaii1) , 1971 .

[4]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Agonistic interactions in a keystone predatory starfish , 1988 .

[5]  A. Hines,et al.  Guild structure and foraging impact of blue crabs and epibenthic fish in a subestuary of Chesapeake Bay , 1990 .

[6]  B. L. Welch.  ON THE COMPARISON OF SEVERAL MEAN VALUES: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH , 1951 .

[7]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Carrying food items to cover for consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  L. D. Smith.  Patterns of limb loss in the blue crab, Callinctes sapidus Rathbun, and the effects of autotomy on growth , 1990 .

[9]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[10]  B. Hazlett,et al.  Directed currents: A hydrodynamic display in hermit crabs , 1989 .

[11]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Effects of shallow water refuge on behavior and density-dependent mortality of juvenile blue crabs in Chesapeake Bay , 1995 .

[12]  M. Posey,et al.  Effects of adult suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves on recruitment of estuarine infauna , 1989 .

[13]  R. Jachowski.  Agonistic Behavior of the Blue Crab, Callinect Us Sapid Us Rathbun , 1974 .

[14]  M. E. Clark,et al.  Foraging and agonistic activity co-occur in free-ranging blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus): observation of animals by ultrasonic telemetry , 1999 .

[15]  T. Wolcott,et al.  Ultrasonic telemetry of small-scale movements and microhabitat selection by molting blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) , 1990 .

[16]  R. Clarke,et al.  Rates of food intake and aggression of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus on the most and least preferred mussel Mytilus edulis beds of the exe estuary , 1984 .

[17]  B. Ens,et al.  Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary , 1984 .

[18]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[19]  R. Lipcius,et al.  Density-dependent foraging and mutual interference in blue crabs preying upon infaunal clams , 1991 .

[20]  Vigilance and diet selection: a simple example in the dark-eyed junco , 1988 .

[21]  Alan E. Burger,et al.  Baleen whales and their prey in a coastal environment , 1989 .

[22]  J. Goss‐Custard.  Predator Responses and Prey Mortality in Redshank, Tringa totanus (L.), and a Preferred Prey, Corophium volutator (Pallas) , 1977 .

[23]  T. Wolcott,et al.  A telemetric study of microhabitat selection by premolt and molting blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun), within a subestuary of the Pamlico river, North Carolina , 1991 .

[24]  Thomas G. Wolcott,et al.  Advances in ultrasonic biotelemetry for animal movement and behavior: the Blue Crab case study , 1996 .

[25]  L. D. Smith.  Effects of limb autotomy and tethering on juvenile blue crab survival from cannibalism , 1995 .

[26]  J. Goss‐Custard,et al.  The density of migratory and overwintering redshank, Tringa totanus (L.) and curlew, Numenius arquata (L.), in relation to the density of their prey in south-east England , 1977 .

[27]  J. Gerritsen,et al.  Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model , 1977 .

[28]  Felicity A. Huntingford,et al.  The influence of predation risk on the feeding motivation and foraging strategy of juvenile Atlantic salmon , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Marc J. Weissburg,et al.  Life and Death in Moving Fluids: Hydrodynamic Effects on Chemosensory‐Mediated Predation , 1993 .

[30]  S. Holbrook,et al.  Patch selection by juvenile black surfperch (Embiotocidae) under variable risk: interactive influence of food quality and structural complexity , 1985 .