An overview of the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health using benthic invertebrates

Community structure or species composition of benthic invertebrates has frequently been used in environmental monitoring and assessment of aquatic systems. Three general approaches have been taken: the ‘saprobic’ approach, which requires detailed knowledge of taxonomy and is most effective in measuring impacts from sewage effluents; diversity indices, which do not require detailed knowledge of species requirements but ignore information provided by important species and tend to lose information; and biotic indices, which combine both approaches. In the past few years considerable advances have been made by applying multivariate statistical techniques to large data matrices and relating benthic community structure to key environmental variables. Using these techniques it is possible to establish reference communities for a set of environmental conditions, to predict the benthic community that should occur at new sites and thus measure deviation from an expected community type. This suggests that environmental criteria and objectives can be established based on biological variables as opposed to the more traditional chemical approach.Measurement of ecosystem health using functional attributes of benthic invertebrates is generally in the development stage. In the future, functional measures of ecosystem health, such as chronic measures of toxicity or stress, should be incorporated into any assessment process.

[1]  R. Kolkwitz,et al.  Ökologie der tierischen Saprobien. Beiträge zur Lehre von der biologischen Gewässerbeurteilung , 1909 .

[2]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  Biology of polluted waters , 1966 .

[3]  J. Wilhm,et al.  Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria , 1968 .

[4]  Charles E. Warren,et al.  Biology and water pollution control , 1971 .

[5]  F. M. Chutter,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL BIOTIC INDEX OF THE QUALITY OF WATER IN SOUTH AFRICAN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1972 .

[6]  Susan E. Cook Quest for an index of community structure sensitive to water pollution , 1976 .

[7]  D. Brock Comparison of community similarity indexes , 1977 .

[8]  Guido Persoone,et al.  Systems of Biological Indicators for Water Quality Assessment , 1979 .

[9]  David L. Kuhn,et al.  Protozoan colonization of artificial substrates , 1979 .

[10]  O. A. Sæther Chironomid communities as water quality indicators , 1979 .

[11]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .

[12]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[13]  J. Cairns Biological monitoring part I—Early warning systems , 1980 .

[14]  M. P. Farrell,et al.  Insect Community Structure as an Index of Heavy-Metal Pollution in Lotic Ecosystems , 1980 .

[15]  K. W. Dance,et al.  Some effects of agricultural land use on stream insect communities , 1980 .

[16]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Longitudinal and Seasonal Changes in Functional Organization of Macroinvertebrate Communities in Four Oregon Streams , 1981 .

[17]  John Cairns,et al.  Biological monitoring Part VI—future needs , 1981 .

[18]  P. Chapman,et al.  Relative tolerances of selected aquatic oligochaetes to individual pollutants and environmental factors , 1982 .

[19]  W. Slooff Benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality assessment: Some toxicological considerations , 1983 .

[20]  The uses and abuses of ecotoxicology , 1983 .

[21]  M. T. Furse,et al.  The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites , 1983 .

[22]  P. Chapman,et al.  The use of bioassays as part of a comprehensive approach to marine pollution assessment , 1983 .

[23]  H. Tolkamp,et al.  Hydropsychidae as bio-indicators , 1983, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[24]  H. Washington,et al.  Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems , 1984 .

[25]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data , 1984 .

[26]  J. Wright,et al.  The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro‐invertebrate communities , 1984 .

[27]  W. F. Warwick Morphological Abnormalities in Chironomidae (Diptera) Larvae as Measures of Toxic Stress in Freshwater Ecosystems: Indexing Antennal Deformities in Chironomus Meigen , 1985 .

[28]  S. Mozley,et al.  Distribution of Oligochaetes in Lake Michigan and Comments on Their use as Indices of Pollution , 1985 .

[29]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Ground Water Pollution Control , 1985 .

[30]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  A Sediment Quality Triad: Measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound , 1985 .

[31]  P. A. Lewis,et al.  An evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate biomass methodology , 1985, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[32]  S. P. Davies,et al.  Benthic invertebrate response to pollution abatement: structural changes and functional implications , 1985 .

[33]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment , 1986 .

[34]  L. Corkum,et al.  Distributional patterns of immature Simuliidae (Diptera) in northwestern North America , 1987 .

[35]  T. Hruby Using similarity measures in benthic impact assessments , 1987, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[36]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  The prediction of the macro‐invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running‐water sites in Great Britain using environmental data , 1987 .

[37]  W. Hilsenhoff,et al.  An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution , 2017, The Great Lakes Entomologist.

[38]  S. Ormerod,et al.  The ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the River Wye in relation to environmental factors , 1987 .

[39]  J. Wright,et al.  A new approach to the biological surveillance of river quality using macroinvertebrates: With 2 figures and 2 tables in the text , 1988 .

[40]  J. Olive,et al.  Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Indexes of Water Quality in the Upper Cuyahoga River , 1988 .

[41]  K. Cummins The Study of Stream Ecosystems: A Functional View , 1988 .

[42]  R. Hughes,et al.  Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection , 1988 .

[43]  W. Hilsenhoff Rapid Field Assessment of Organic Pollution with a Family-Level Biotic Index , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[44]  J. Giesy,et al.  Freshwater Sediment Toxicity Bioassessment: Rationale for Species Selection and Test Design , 1989 .

[45]  J. G. Rae Chironomid Midges as Indicators of Organic Pollution in the Scioto River Basin, Ohio , 1989 .

[46]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Classification and ordination of profundal macroinvertebrate communities in nutrient poor, oligo‐mesohumic lakes in relation to environmental data , 1989 .

[47]  The biological assessment of contaminated sediments — the Detroit River example , 1989 .

[48]  M. T. Furse,et al.  Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements , 1989 .

[49]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. , 1989, Environmental pollution.

[50]  E. Orive,et al.  The relationship between water quality and caddisfly assemblage structure in fast-running rivers. The River Cadagua basin , 1990, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[51]  W. F. Warwick Morphological Deformities in Chironomidae (Diptera) Larvae from the Lac St. Louis and Laprairie Basins of the St. Lawrence River , 1990 .

[52]  J. Karr Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.