Effect of noise type and level on focus related fundamental frequency changes

Speech in noise, or Lombard speech, is characterized by increased intensity and higher fundamental frequency as well as lengthened segmental durations as speakers try to maintain a beneficial signal-to-noise ratio to fill both communicative and self-monitoring requirements. The phenomenon has been studied with regard to different noise types and different noise levels, as well as with respect to different communicative tasks (e.g., reading out loud vs. speaking to a real listener). However, there are no studies where the effect has been measured with different noises keeping the loudness levels equal. Here we study the Lombard effect with three different noise types at three levels with equal loudness while varying focus structure to elicit different pitch contours. The results show that people adapt their intonation contours depending on both noise level and type even when the noises are similar with respect to their perceived loudness. This points to a special role for pitch in Lombard speech.

[1]  R. Patel,et al.  The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al.  Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems , 1993, Speech Commun..

[3]  Mark E. Laidre,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd edn. By JACK W. Bradbury & Sandra L. Vehrencamp. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer (2011). Pp. xiv + 697. Price $99.95. , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Anja Arnhold,et al.  Multiple Prosodic Parameters Signaling Information Structure: Parallel Focus Marking in Finnish , 2011, ICPhS.

[5]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Focus in production: tonal shape, intensity and word order. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M P Rastatter,et al.  The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults. , 1985, The Journal of auditory research.

[7]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[8]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[9]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[10]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Intonation of Finnish Verbs , 2010 .

[11]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[12]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Brumm,et al.  The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research , 2011 .