Optimal Groundwater Remediation Using Artificial Neural Networks

The significant cost and complexity of groundwater remediation and water resources management has encouraged integration of optimization techniques with groundwater flow and transport modeling to search for efficient groundwater management strategies. This integration of methodologies has often been referred to as simulationmanagement modeling or simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling. The values of the objective function and constraints of the optimization problem are calculated by the groundwater flow and transport models run as a submodel of the optimization driver. In the area of remediation, example objectives could be minimizing costs or maximizing contaminant mass removed; constraints might be avoiding dewatering or a total pumping volume limit. A general groundwater management model will use optimization techniques to search among almost infinite numbers of treatment or control strategies possibilities for ones that meet management goals while minimizing cost. The main advantage of applying these mathematical tools to decision-making problems is that they are less restricted by human imagination than case-by-case comparisons. As the number of competing engineering, economic, and environmental planning objectives and constraints increases, it becomes difficult for human planners to track complex interactions and select a manageable set of promising scenarios for examination. Using optimization techniques, the search can range over all possible combinations of variables, locating strategies whose effectiveness is not always obvious to planners.

[1]  C. Reeves Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[2]  S. K. Gupta,et al.  Coupled Fluid, Energy, and Solute Transport (CFEST) model: Formulation and user's manual , 1987 .

[3]  Virginia M. Johnson,et al.  Location Analysis in Ground‐Water Remediation Using Neural Networks , 1995 .

[4]  David E. Dougherty,et al.  Optimal groundwater management: 2. Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site , 1993 .

[5]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  The GENITOR Algorithm and Selection Pressure: Why Rank-Based Allocation of Reproductive Trials is Best , 1989, ICGA.

[6]  David E. Dougherty,et al.  Hydrologic Applications of the Connection Machine CM‐2 , 1991 .

[7]  G. Christakos,et al.  Sampling design for classifying contaminant level using annealing search algorithms , 1993 .

[8]  R. Peralta,et al.  Modeling for Optimal Management of Agricultural and Domestic Wastewater Loading to Streams , 1995 .

[9]  V. M. Johnson,et al.  Using artifical neutral networks and the genetic algorithm to optimize well-field design: Phase I , 1998 .

[10]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[11]  Gilbert Syswerda,et al.  Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms , 1989, ICGA.

[12]  C. Voss,et al.  SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated Transport). A Finite-Element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Fluid-Density-Dependent Ground-Water Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically-Reactive Single-Species Solute Transport. , 1984 .

[13]  Steven G. Smith,et al.  Use of high performance computing to examine the effectiveness of aquifer remediation , 1994 .

[14]  Amir F. Atiya,et al.  How initial conditions affect generalization performance in large networks , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  D. McKinney,et al.  Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models , 1994 .

[16]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Computational Methods in Geosciences , 1992 .

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[18]  W. Alley Regression Approximations for Transport Model Constraint Sets in Combined Aquifer Simulation-Optimization Studies , 1986 .

[19]  Farid U. Dowla,et al.  Backpropagation Learning for Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Networks Using the Conjugate Gradient Method , 1991, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[20]  P. F. McKereghan,et al.  Preliminary simulation of contaminant migration in ground water at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , 1995 .

[21]  B. Wagner Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling (95RG00394) , 1995 .

[22]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[23]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimal field-scale groundwater remediation using neural networks and the genetic algorithm. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  J. Eheart,et al.  Using Genetic Algorithms to Solve a Multiobjective Groundwater Monitoring Problem , 1995 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[26]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  S. Gorelick A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods , 1983 .

[28]  David E. Dougherty,et al.  Design Optimization for Multiple Management Period Groundwater Remediation , 1996 .

[29]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[30]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Simulating physical processes and economic behavior in saline, irrigated agriculture: model development , 1990 .

[31]  G. Pinder,et al.  Groundwater management using numerical simulation and the outer approximation method for global optimization , 1993 .

[32]  David E. Dougherty,et al.  Markov chain length effects on optimization in groundwater management by simulated annealing , 1992 .

[33]  S. Ranjithan,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem , 1994 .