A new method for dealing with the stimulus artefact in electrically evoked compound action potential measurements

Objective Residual charge on recording electrodes leads to elevated potentials after the end of the stimulus, which can easily overload the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) recording systems (neural response imaging or neural response telemetry). A new method for dealing with this problem was tested in a series of animal experiments. Material and Methods We developed an amplifier with a compensation circuit that reduces the effect of the residual charge by electrical subtraction at the input. Using this amplifier we compared different artefact rejection protocols simultaneously in chronically implanted guinea pigs. A new, systematic nomenclature for the various forward masking schemes, based on the number of frames involved, is proposed. Results Proper adjustment of the compensation circuit reduces the overload time from >200 μs to <30 μs, but the compensation signals influence the final output signal considerably. To eliminate this deliberately introduced, reproducible artefact, an additional artefact rejection scheme is necessary. With alternating polarity (AP) and forward masking paradigms we could reliably record the N1 peak. Forward masking responses reveal shorter latencies for cathodic-first biphasic stimuli than for anodic-first pulses. The average of these two closely resembles the response obtained with the AP paradigm. Conclusions It is worthwhile implementing the electrical compensation method proposed herein in clinical neural response imaging or neural response telemetry systems, as it represents a more robust way of assessing the eCAP.

[1]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Narrow-band analysis of compound action potentials for several stimulus conditions in the guinea pig , 1981, Hearing Research.

[2]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J H Frijns,et al.  A multi-channel simultaneous data acquisition and waveform generator system designed for medical applications. , 1994, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[4]  J. Frijns,et al.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.

[5]  P J Abbas,et al.  Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[6]  S Peeters,et al.  New developments in cochlear implants. , 1998, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[7]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation , 1998, Hearing Research.

[8]  J K Shallop,et al.  Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  An Improved Method of Reducing Stimulus Artifact in the Electrically Evoked Whole‐Nerve Potential , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Integrated use of volume conduction and neural models to simulate the response to cochlear implants , 2000, Simul. Pract. Theory.

[11]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  Jeroen J. Briaire,et al.  Initial Evaluation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Neural Response Imaging , 2002, Ear and hearing.