Multistability of Overlapped Face Stimuli is Dependent upon Orientation

Stimuli composed of two overlapped faces, one rotated 45° clockwise and the other 45° counterclockwise, produce perceptual rivalry whereby both faces cannot be simultaneously perceived. We obtained subjective and quantitative measures of this rivalry effect and examined if it persists with inverted stimuli. Our results show that upright stimuli are multistable, with alternations occurring from one face to the other within 2 s. Inverted stimuli were instead perceived as ambiguous in half of the trials, indicating weaker perceptual rivalry in that condition. We suggest that overlapped faces produce perceptual rivalry because each face is readily interpreted into a Gestalt, an effect that in turn is dependent upon orientation.

[1]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[2]  F. Galton.  Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development , 1883 .

[3]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Disambiguating Ambiguous Figures by Selective Attention , 1985 .

[4]  L. H. Pelton,et al.  Stability and Attraction of Perceptual Organizations in the Reversible Figure-Ground Phenomenon , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Scotto Ma,et al.  Eye movements and reversal rates of ambiguous patterns. , 1990 .

[7]  Eugene Chekaluk,et al.  The Role of eye movements in perceptual processes , 1992 .

[8]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  G. A. Oliva,et al.  Eye movements and reversal rates of ambiguous patterns. , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  I. Rock,et al.  An introduction to perception , 1975 .

[12]  F. Attneave.  Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[13]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Multiple Representations of the Same Reversible Figure: Implications for Cognitive Decisional Interpretations , 1981, Perception.

[18]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Dennis C. Hay,et al.  Configural information in face recognition , 1987 .

[20]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  E. Engel,et al.  The rôle content in binocular resolution. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  V. Ruggieri,et al.  Gaze Orientation in Perception of Reversible Figures , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  M. García-Pérez.  Eye Movements and Perceptual Multistability , 1992 .

[26]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[28]  R. Gregory.  The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[29]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Role of attention in face encoding , 1994 .

[30]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[31]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[32]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[33]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Expertise in object and face recognition , 1997 .

[34]  G M Long,et al.  To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? , 1999, The American journal of psychology.

[35]  I Rock,et al.  Further Evidence of Failure of Reversal of Ambiguous Figures by Uninformed Subjects , 1992, Perception.