The change in contact angle at unsaturated CO2‐water conditions: Implication on geological carbon dioxide sequestration

The performance of a geologic carbon storage site strongly depends on the capillary pressure of sealing rock and formations. While wettability of minerals is a key factor in capillary pressure, published contact angles are inconsistent. This study explores the discrepancy of published contact angles in order to reduce the uncertainty of measured laboratory contact angles, and understand the variation of contact angles at unsaturated CO2‐water conditions. A ratio of droplet dimension and triple line (or contact line) are used to explain the observed wide range of contact angles and the variation of contact angle at unsaturated conditions. Results show that the shape factor has a good agreement with contact angle change during CO2 dissolution in water. Silica substrate has clear two pinned and slip stages of triple line during CO2 droplet dissolution, which cause contact angle on silica substrate to increase from 34.5° to 42.1°. However, mica substrate has the repeated pinned and slip stages due to the heterogeneity of mica surface, which cause contact angle to increase dramatically from 25.4° to 68.1°. Thus, both the impact of the unsaturated CO2‐water conditions on the wide range of contact angle and the heterogeneity of mineral surface should be considered when one estimates capillary pressure based on contact angle in geological CO2 sequestration.

[1]  M. Blunt,et al.  Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage - From pore scale physics to field scale implications , 2015 .

[2]  S. Iglauer,et al.  N2+CO2+NaCl brine interfacial tensions and contact angles on quartz at CO2 storage site conditions in the Gippsland basin, Victoria/Australia , 2015 .

[3]  M. Piri,et al.  Co-sequestration of SO 2 with supercritical CO 2 in carbonates: An experimental study of capillary trapping, relative permeability, and capillary pressure , 2015 .

[4]  S. Iglauer,et al.  Influence of temperature and pressure on quartz-water-CO₂ contact angle and CO₂-water interfacial tension. , 2015, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  Yongman Kim,et al.  Contact angle measurement ambiguity in supercritical CO2–water–mineral systems: Mica as an example , 2014 .

[6]  A. Saghafi,et al.  Study of coal gas wettability for CO2storage and CH4recovery , 2014 .

[7]  Xiaoqiang Bian,et al.  A Review of CO2 Sequestration Projects and Application in China , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[8]  K. Wolf,et al.  Wettability Evaluation of a CO2/Water/Bentheimer Sandstone System: Contact Angle, Dissolution, and Bubble Size , 2014 .

[9]  Chi M. Phan,et al.  Contamination of silica surfaces: Impact on water–CO2–quartz and glass contact angle measurements , 2014 .

[10]  M. Piri,et al.  Wettability of supercritical carbon dioxide/water/quartz systems: simultaneous measurement of contact angle and interfacial tension at reservoir conditions. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  Shibo Wang,et al.  Wettability phenomena at the CO2-brine-mineral interface: implications for geologic carbon sequestration. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  D. Broseta,et al.  Are rocks still water‐wet in the presence of dense CO2 or H2S? , 2012 .

[13]  J. Wan,et al.  Supercritical CO2 and Ionic Strength Effects on Wettability of Silica Surfaces: Equilibrium Contact Angle Measurements , 2012 .

[14]  Seyed Nezameddin Ashrafizadeh,et al.  Wettability determination by contact angle measurements: hvbB coal-water system with injection of synthetic flue gas and CO2. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  Bruce J. Palmer,et al.  Pore-scale study of capillary trapping mechanism during CO2 injection in geological formations , 2011 .

[16]  Guillaume Lamour,et al.  Contact Angle Measurements Using a Simplified Experimental Setup , 2010 .

[17]  D. Lohse,et al.  Origin of line tension for a Lennard-Jones nanodroplet , 2010, 1010.0517.

[18]  J. Carlos Santamarina,et al.  Water‐CO2‐mineral systems: Interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion—Implications to CO2 geological storage , 2010 .

[19]  Toby Aiken,et al.  Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations , 2010 .

[20]  V. Rudolph,et al.  Changes in reservoir properties from injection of supercritical CO2 into coal seams — A laboratory study , 2010 .

[21]  S. Bachu,et al.  Interfacial Tension between CO2, Freshwater, and Brine in the Range of Pressure from (2 to 27) MPa, Temperature from (20 to 125) °C, and Water Salinity from (0 to 334 000) mg·L−1 , 2009 .

[22]  M. Farzaneh,et al.  Effect of contact angle hysteresis on water droplet evaporation from super-hydrophobic surfaces , 2009 .

[23]  Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul,et al.  Wettability Determination of the Reservoir Brine−Reservoir Rock System with Dissolution of CO2 at High Pressures and Elevated Temperatures , 2008 .

[24]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Dependence of CO2-brine interfacial tension on aquifer pressure, temperature and water salinity , 2007 .

[25]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps , 2007 .

[26]  Sam Holloway,et al.  Natural emissions of CO2 from the geosphere and their bearing on the geological storage of carbon dioxide , 2007 .

[27]  C. A. Ward,et al.  Pressure dependence of the contact angle. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  Pierre Chiquet,et al.  Wettability alteration of caprock minerals by carbon dioxide , 2007 .

[29]  Hans Bruining,et al.  Pressure dependence of the contact angle in a CO2-H2O-coal system. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[30]  K. Johnston,et al.  Wetting phenomena at the CO2/water/glass interface. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[31]  G McHale,et al.  Analysis of droplet evaporation on a superhydrophobic surface. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  Sam Holloway,et al.  Underground sequestration of carbon dioxide—a viable greenhouse gas mitigation option , 2005 .

[33]  S. Vafaei,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between liquid droplet size and contact angle. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[34]  M. Podowski,et al.  Theoretical analysis on the effect of liquid droplet geometry on contact angle , 2005 .

[35]  Rafael Tadmor,et al.  Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and young contact angles. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[36]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[37]  J. Pashin,et al.  Temperature–pressure conditions in coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior basin: implications for carbon sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2003 .

[38]  A. Neumann,et al.  Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis. , 2002, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[39]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change , 2000 .

[40]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation , 1999 .

[41]  Hiroyuki Saito,et al.  Effects of surface roughness on wettability , 1998 .

[42]  Dongqing Li.  Drop size dependence of contact angles and line tensions of solid-liquid systems , 1996 .

[43]  H. Fujii,et al.  Effect of gravity on contact angle , 1995 .

[44]  B. Widom,et al.  Young's law with gravity , 1995 .

[45]  Dongqing Li,et al.  The effect of surface heterogeneity on the drop size dependence of contact angles , 1995 .

[46]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping , 1994 .

[47]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Effect of Surface Roughness on the Dependence of Contact Angles on Drop Size , 1993 .

[48]  J. Hupka,et al.  The effect of drop size on contact angle over a wide range of drop volumes , 1993 .

[49]  S. Garoff,et al.  An Investigation of Microscopic Aspects of Contact Angle Hysteresis: Pinning of the Contact Line on a Single Defect , 1992 .

[50]  A. Neumann,et al.  The dependence of contact angles on drop size and line tension , 1987 .

[51]  R. Good,et al.  The effect of drop size on contact angle , 1979 .

[52]  W. J. Herzberg,et al.  Relationship between contact angle and drop size , 1970 .

[53]  A. Saghafi,et al.  Gas Wettability of Coal and Implications for Gas Desorption and Drainage , 2014 .

[54]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Engineered CO2 injection: The use of surfactants for enhanced sweep efficiency , 2014 .

[55]  Ole Torsæter,et al.  Wettability behaviour of CO2 at storage conditions , 2013 .

[56]  E. Lindeberg,et al.  CO2 Wettability Behavior During CO2 Sequestration in Saline Aquifer -An Experimental Study on Minerals Representing Sandstone and Carbonate , 2013 .

[57]  Vello Kuuskraa,et al.  CO2 storage in depleted oil fields: The worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery , 2011 .

[58]  Darren L. Williams,et al.  Computerised Measurement of Contact Angles , 2010 .

[59]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Water ‐ CO 2 ‐ mineral systems : Interfacial tension , contact angle , and diffusion — Implications to CO 2 geological storage , 2010 .

[60]  H. Bertin,et al.  Interfacial tension measurements and wettability evaluation for geological CO2 storage , 2009 .

[61]  D. Broseta,et al.  Capillary Alteration of Caprocks by Acid Gases , 2008 .

[62]  Pierre Chiquet,et al.  Capillary Alteration Of Shaly Caprocks By Carbon Dioxide , 2005 .

[63]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Determination of line tension from the drop size dependence of contact angles , 1990 .

[64]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Energetics of vortex rollup and pairing , 1980 .

[65]  R. Good.  Contact Angles and the Surface Free Energy of Solids , 1979 .