New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database

The North American gravity database as well as data- bases from Canada, Mexico, and the United States are being revised to improve their coverage, versatility, and accuracy. An important part of this effort is revising pro- cedures for calculating gravity anomalies, taking into ac- count our enhanced computational power, improved ter- rain databases and datums, and increased interest in more accurately defining long-wavelength anomaly components. Users of the databases may note minor differences be- tween previous and revised database values as a result of these procedures. Generally, the differences do not impact the interpretation of local anomalies but do improve re- gional anomaly studies. The most striking revision is the use of the internationally accepted terrestrial ellipsoid for the height datum of gravity stations rather than the conven- tionally used geoid or sea level. Principal facts of gravity observations and anomalies based on both revised and pre- vious procedures together with germane metadata will be available on an interactive Web-based data system as well as from national agencies and data centers. The use of the revised procedures is encouraged for gravity data reduc- tion because of the widespread use of the global position- ing system in gravity fieldwork and the need for increased accuracy and precision of anomalies and consistency with North American and national databases. Anomalies based on the revised standards should be preceded by the adjec- tive "ellipsoidal" to differentiate anomalies calculated us- ing heights with respect to the ellipsoid from those based on conventional elevations referenced to the geoid.

[1]  Walter D. Mooney,et al.  Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view , 1995 .

[2]  On the Honkasalo term in tidal corrections to gravimetric observations , 1979 .

[3]  The theory of the Bouguer gravity anomaly: A tutorial , 1996 .

[4]  T. R. Lafehr An exact solution for the gravity curvature (Bullard B) correction , 1991 .

[5]  J. H. Bodine,et al.  Considerations of the indirect effect in marine gravity modeling , 1979 .

[6]  B. Taylor,et al.  Adjusting the Values of the Fundamental Constants , 2001 .

[7]  D. A. Chapin A deterministic approach toward isostatic gravity residuals—A case study from South America , 1996 .

[8]  J. G. Tanner,et al.  GRAVITY ANOMALY MAP OF NORTH AMERICA , 1988 .

[9]  Chris Green,et al.  The use of GPS in gravity surveys , 2003 .

[10]  K. G. Shields,et al.  A documentation program , 1977 .

[11]  William J. Hinze,et al.  Bouguer reduction density, why 2.67? , 2003 .

[12]  R. Simpson,et al.  A new isostatic residual gravity map of the conterminous United States with a discussion on the significance of isostatic residual anomalies , 1986 .

[13]  S. Hammer Terrain corrections for gravimeter stations , 1939 .

[14]  On Talwani's ``Errors in the total Bouguer reduction'' , 1998 .

[15]  Xiong Li,et al.  Ellipsoid, geoid, gravity, geodesy, and geophysics , 2001 .

[16]  T. R. Lafehr Standardization in gravity reduction , 1991 .

[17]  Richard H. Godson,et al.  BOUGUER Version 1.0 : a microcomputer gravity-terrain-correction program , 1988 .

[18]  W. Featherstone,et al.  Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’ , 2003 .

[19]  H. Moritz,et al.  Geodetic reference system 1980 , 1988 .

[20]  Robert C. Jachens,et al.  Documentation of a FORTRAN program, 'isocomp', for computing isostatic residual gravity , 1981 .

[21]  W. Heiskanen,et al.  The Earth And Its Gravity Field , 1959 .

[22]  Barry N. Taylor,et al.  Fundamental Physical Constants , 2019, Spin-Label Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

[23]  Errors in the total Bouguer reduction , 1998 .