Inverse Optimal Control Using A Neural Multi-Step Predictor For T1DM Treatment

Regarding Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) research, the most recent advances in computer technology and biological sciences have focused on reducing complications due to hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic events. These dangerous conditions can lead to severe micro- and macrovascular damages, diabetic coma and even death. In this work, a novel inverse optimal approach for glycemic control in T1DM is proposed. The complete scheme integrates a neuronal identifier and a neural multi-step predictor to obtain future glucose readings; in order to allow that an optimal controller anticipates against a potential risk scenario. Validation is carried out using the well-known UVa/PAdova Simulator and the training data is obtained from a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) sensor. Closed-loop control results are presented with the average value for the three diabetic populations available in the UVa[Padova simulator: adults, adolescents and children. A basal insulin infusion rate and a five meal protocol are proposed for each population. For this scenario, the Neural Multi-Step Predictor (NMSP) configuration, combined with the neural inverse optimal controller, is able to keep glucose within normal levels 70–115 mg/dL and below 250 mg/dL postprandial lapse. Finally, the comparative framework of the Control Variability Grid Analysis (CVGA) displays that most of the patients are in the safe zones with the NMSP approach.

[1]  Tomoki Ohsawa,et al.  Discrete Hamilton-Jacobi theory and discrete optimal control , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Discrete-Time Nonlinear HJB Solution Using Approximate Dynamic Programming: Convergence Proof , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[3]  C. Cobelli,et al.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  Yen-Ming Chiang,et al.  Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting , 2007 .

[5]  K. Alberti,et al.  The classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. , 2010, The New Zealand medical journal.

[6]  Alexander G. Loukianov,et al.  Discrete-Time Adaptive Backstepping Nonlinear Control via High-Order Neural Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[7]  Kevin Fiedler,et al.  Robust Nonlinear Control Design State Space And Lyapunov Techniques , 2016 .

[8]  Marco Forgione,et al.  Run-to-Run Tuning of Model Predictive Control for Type 1 Diabetes Subjects: In Silico Trial , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[9]  E. Ruiz-Velazquez,et al.  Neural inverse optimal control applied to type 1 diabetes mellitus patients , 2012, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing.

[10]  Victor M. Becerra,et al.  Optimal control , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[11]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  GIM, Simulation Software of Meal Glucose—Insulin Model , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  Marc D. Breton,et al.  Modular Closed-Loop Control of Diabetes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  C. Cobelli,et al.  In Silico Preclinical Trials: A Proof of Concept in Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[14]  Elena Moltchanova,et al.  Chapter 3. Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes , 2010 .

[15]  T. Başar,et al.  Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory , 1982 .

[16]  R. Hovorka Continuous glucose monitoring and closed‐loop systems , 2006, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[17]  Manolis A. Christodoulou,et al.  Adaptive Control with Recurrent High-order Neural Networks , 2000, Advances in Industrial Control.