Fracture toughness characterisation in the ductile-to-brittle transition and upper shelf regimes using pre-cracked Charpy single-edge bend specimens

Abstract Fracture toughness data of pre-cracked Charpy single-edge bend, SE(B), specimens are compared with those of standard compact, C(T), specimens in the upper shelf and ductile-to-brittle transition regimes. Charpy sized SE(B) specimens provide ductile fracture toughness data, which are compatible with those of standard C(T) specimens. Statistical methods such as the exponential curve fitting method (ECF), the engineering lower bound toughness method (ELB), and the Master Curve method (MC) are used to provide meaningful lower bound cleavage fracture toughness estimates from the toughness scatter of the Charpy sized SE(B) specimens in the ductile-to-brittle transition regime. In this regime, according to the ELB and MC methods, SE(B) specimens provide cleavage toughness data, which tend to be non-conservative compared to those of standard C(T) specimens. However, analyses based on the exponential curve fitting method show good agreement between the fracture toughness estimates for the C(T) and Charpy size SE(B) specimens. At the lower bound toughness level (5% cleavage failure probability), corresponding to J=100 N/mm, the ductile-to-brittle transition curves of SE(B) specimens are reduced by 5–8 °C compared to those of standard C(T) specimens according to the MC-method. A constraint correction function for SE(B) specimens is presented that can be used to make cleavage toughness data of SE(B) specimens compatible with those of standard C(T) specimens.

[1]  R. Mosković,et al.  Competing risks models for fracture in the ductile to brittle transition temperature region , 1995 .

[2]  Schwalbe,et al.  ENGINEERING ESTIMATION OF THE LOWER BOUND TOUGHNESS IN THE TRANSITION REGIME OF FERRITIC STEELS , 2002 .

[3]  R. Mosković Analysis of fracture toughness data in the brittle to ductile transition region for creusot-loire A508 class 3 forging used in the construction of PWR reactors , 1995 .

[4]  B. Neale An assessment of fracture toughness in the ductile to brittle transition regime using the Euro fracture toughness dataset , 2002 .

[5]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Master curve analysis of the Euro fracture toughness dataset , 2002 .

[6]  J. Heerens,et al.  Development of the Euro fracture toughness dataset , 2002 .

[7]  Robert Moskovic Modelling of fracture toughness data in the ductile to brittle transition temperature region by statistical analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Narendra J. Sheth,et al.  Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments , 1973 .

[9]  Peter E J Flewitt,et al.  An overview of the materials issues relating to the continued operation of the Magnox steel reactor pressure vessels , 1998 .

[10]  Jerald F. Lawless,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. , 1983 .

[11]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0 , 2001 .

[12]  K. Wallin Optimized estimation of the Weibull distribution parameters , 1989 .

[13]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Constraint comparisons for common fracture specimens: C(T)s and SE(B)s , 2004 .

[14]  R. Mosković,et al.  Statistical analysis of censored fracture toughness data in the ductile to brittle transition temperature region , 1993 .

[15]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  An engineering approach to assess constraint effects on cleavage fracture toughness , 2001 .

[16]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Applicability of miniature size bend specimens to determine the master curve reference temperature T0 , 2001 .