The performance improvements of train suspension systems with mechanical networks employing inerters

This paper investigates the performance benefits of train suspension systems employing a new mechanical network element called an inerter. An inerter is a true mechanical two-terminal element with the applied force proportional to the relative acceleration across the terminals. Until now, ideal inerters have been applied to car and motorcycle suspension systems, for which a significant performance improvement was reported. In this paper, we discuss the performance benefits of train suspension systems employing inerters. The study was carried out in three phases. First, fixed suspension structures were applied to train suspension systems, and optimised for two performance measures. Secondly, this optimisation was further carried out using linear matrix inequality approaches to discuss the achievable performance of passive networks. The resulting networks can then be realised by synthesis methods, such as the Brune and Bott–Duffin realisation. Finally, the nonlinear properties of inerter models and their impact on system performance were discussed. From the results, the inerter was deemed effective in improving the performance of train suspension systems.

[1]  J. D. Robson.  ROAD SURFACE DESCRIPTION AND VEHICLE RESPONSE , 1979 .

[2]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Mechatronic suspension design and its applications to vehicle suspension control , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  S. Evangelou,et al.  Steering compensation for high-performance motorcycles , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[5]  Chung-Huang Yu,et al.  The Performance Improvements of Train Suspension Systems with Inerters , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Malcolm C. Smith,et al.  Positive real synthesis using matrix inequalities for mechanical networks: application to vehicle suspension , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Impact of inerter nonlinearities on vehicle suspension control , 2008 .

[8]  Per-Olof Gutman,et al.  New models for backlash and gear play , 1997 .

[9]  E. Yaz.  Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Malcolm C. Smith.  Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Chan Ghee Koh,et al.  Moving element method for train‐track dynamics , 2003 .

[13]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Performance benefits in passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[14]  Nageswara Rao Posinasetti,et al.  Machine Design , 1907, Nature.

[15]  M.C. Smith,et al.  Laboratory experimental testing of inerters , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  Malcolm C. Smith,et al.  Mechanical networks comprising one damper and one inerter , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  Robert L. Norton,et al.  Machine Design: An Integrated Approach , 1996 .